Could you stack those a bit? They don't resize, because each picture isn't big enough to trigger it.
[STEAM]AMD/ATI slowly gaining ground
4
- Status
1 - 20 of 23 Posts
Quote:
Nothing wrong with 2 GB RAM on a casual gaming rig.
Originally Posted by Radiix  So many people are still using XP 32-bit with 2GB of ram.. |
Quote:
That is what prebuilt systems usually use.
Originally Posted by Radiix So many people are still using XP 32-bit with 2GB of ram.. |
This is cool, I was planning on an all-AMD rig nest time. Probably Bulldozer with matching GPU.
![]()
the numbers have always been like this, dunno what you guys are talking about
![]()
Quote:
Yeah... I guess I can understand the sound card thing, but I could not go back to gaming on a 4:3 aspect ratio monitor (especially with first-person shooters)... *blech*
Originally Posted by ljason8eg Other observations: About a third of people still play on 1024x768 or 1280x1024...surprising given how cheap widescreen monitors are now. People generally don't seem to use a sound card either 
|
2
Quote:
Have you forgot the whole dx 10 vista thing? This is nothing. Dx 11 is catching on way faster than that. It's not fail by any means.
Originally Posted by lordikon DX11 is great, what is "fail" is the lack of developers utilizing it, and the lack of DX11 cards in households (these things take time, and TSMC isn't helping). |
Quote:
Indeed.
Originally Posted by Capwn 
|
6
Quote:
Dx10 was fail because most of the benefits were on the programmer's side, and they were stripped out by Nividia. After having reviewed the most recent news article on here about how Nvidia and AMD's stream processors work, it seems obvious to me that Nvidia knew that the real Dx10 would benefit AMD heavily due to AMD's SPs more geared towards higher amounts of smaller coding.
Originally Posted by dham Have you forgot the whole dx 10 vista thing? This is nothing. Dx 11 is catching on way faster than that. It's not fail by any means. |
1 - 20 of 23 Posts
- Status
