Heat Exchange loops does not solve the the viscosity problem with non volatile cooling fluids. I'm not sure this helps me?
tl;dr, You need a way to get your -160°C liquid nitrogen into ethylene glycol that freezes at -65°C. So running it through acetone is the solution because it freezes at -95°C (and has less water molecules) and will allow you to transfer the cold in stages preventing icing/gelling/clogging, rather than applying extreme cold directly to ethylene glycol.
The reason I suggest using two loops is to prevent ice from forming/clogging at the phase-change heat exchanger, because that's where the coldest temperature in the whole system is going to be, so it's the location that the ice will form first. The symptoms of ice clogging your phase-change heat exchanger will look very similar to your cooling fluid having too high of a viscosity, i.e. being unable to be pumped efficiently, because the ice is restricting coolant flow.
Imagine pouring liquid nitrogen on a small copper coil/heat exchanger with ethylene glycol running through it. The coolant will ice up and clog the heat exchanger before getting cold enough for the viscosity of the coolant to make a significant difference to the flow. As ice forms, flow reduces, making more ice form... The problem is that you can't get enough flow to completely prevent ice from forming, so it'll happen sooner or later as long as the initial cooling source is colder than the freezing temperature of the fluid you're using. (Point sources of extreme cold will freeze the water molecule separately of the ethylene glycol molecule, so having a point cold source of less than 0°C risks ice forming in a ethylene glycol/water solution. A uniform extreme cold is what ethylene glycol is rated/tested for, like when the outdoor air temperature is very low, but not for when it's running through a heat exchanger acting as a point cold source that's significantly colder than water's freezing point,)
Now imagine tempering the liquid nitrogen by having it cool another coolant that doesn't ice up as easily (acetone), and then having that coolant cool a separate coolant loop with ethylene glycol in it to make it less dangerous running through your components. The liquid nitrogen won't ice up the acetone as easily, so you'll be able to modulate the application of cold better without icing up.
I don't know if you've been using liquid nitrogen, or a refrigerant/freezer, but direct application of extremely low temperatures on ethylene glycol will freeze it up/form ice crystals which clog everything, thus reducing flow, which then leads to even more ice crystals.
So my point is that tempering your cooling source though a primary loop running acetone, and then through a secondary loop running ethylene glycol, will allow you to control the differential temperatures better to prevent your ethylene glycol from icing up, and therefore not experience issues with ethylene glycol's "viscosity" problem you say you're experiencing, which I would bet is not really that it's too viscous, but that it has gelled/iced up and restricting flow at a single point.
A separate loop is for preventing icing, but also for safety. Ideally you don't want to run acetone though your components because you're dealing with multiple seals and what not, increasing the risk of a coolant loop leak/breach and the additional fire safety risk in addition to that running a volatile coolant through something that needs to be serviced. You can solder/braze your entire acetone coolant loop, and have it separated from the components and electrical sources, which also allows you to lower the volume of the acetone loop if it's only purpose is transferring the cold from the liquid nitrogen/refrigerant to the ethylene glycol.