Overclock.net banner

Switching from DSL to Cable

2442 Views 30 Replies 18 Participants Last post by  MIGhunter
My DSL has been acting really slow. I called them but they told me I would have to pay a service fee since they would have to send someone to my house to check my line. I said no thank you and now I'm moving on.

I pay 30/month for a 1.5-3.0 Download and .5 upload.
But this is what I currently have showing up on my modem

800 Kbps (Downstream)
512 Kbps (Upstream)

As you can clearly see my upload is right but my download speed is less then half. Sometimes it goes even lower. So, I'm dropping these guys and jumping to cable.

New plan is for 10Mbs download and 1.5Mbs upload. for 39.99. Should have done this a while ago.
1 - 20 of 31 Posts
Is that even legal? Not providing you with what you're paying for?
Usually they advertise *up to* in small letters, so it's not illegal. It's a shady business practice though. Hope you enjoy your new found internet speed!
Quote:


Originally Posted by gonX
View Post

Is that even legal? Not providing you with what you're paying for?

I don't know but my cousin has had the same issues in the last few months and I think he's going to jump to another provider as well.
See less See more
there usually isnt a real difference IMO. I used to have dsl a while ago and switched to comcast cable internet, supposedly (5-10 mbps). DL speeds were maybe roughly 5-750 kbps, and only on comcast servers would i get speeds 1-2 mbps. I now have at & t dsl and its like exactly the same speed as comcast even though we have elite (supposedly 15- 20 mbps). They always lie about speeds, never have i had dl speeds even remotely close to what i pay for.
Quote:


Originally Posted by gonX
View Post

Is that even legal? Not providing you with what you're paying for?

As explained, yes, it's legal. The fine print is there in the first place mainly because they don't want to be held liable for faults in their infrastructure as far as available regional bandwidth is concerned; if they didn't have this, our major ISPs would have been sued into bankruptcy by now.
See less See more
Quote:

Originally Posted by D3TH.GRUNT View Post
there usually isnt a real difference IMO. I used to have dsl a while ago and switched to comcast cable internet, supposedly (5-10 mbps). DL speeds were maybe roughly 5-750 kbps, and only on comcast servers would i get speeds 1-2 mbps. I now have at & t dsl and its like exactly the same speed as comcast even though we have elite (supposedly 15- 20 mbps). They always lie about speeds, never have i had dl speeds even remotely close to what i pay for.
You're just not downloading from the right servers. It really depends if said server will max your line or not.
See less See more
I pay for 6mb/1mb and every speedtest I've done @ speedtest.net comes back with 5.7-5.9 down and 0.8-0.9 up. This is during 2am boredom, peak hours, weekends, weekdays, etc.

If they are advertising a speed you should be able to get it and if not get a legitimate reason from them.

Case:
My parents live in rural Alberta, no chance of cable, no chance of DSL, they have a choice between dialup (which we had for years) and new 'wireless' internet, 900mhz receiver advertising 5mb down / 1mb up. Fastest we ever received was 2.5down / 0.4 up, so after a month or two of phone calls and arguing with representatives I finally got them to admit that the hardware simply wasn't capable of ever deliver those speeds to my parents house, thankfully I got this all on record and from now on my parents only have to pay half price since they are barely getting half the advertised speeds.
Using FIOS connection atm and i get around -10 ms lower than cable (100/5)Cable is the best For low latency and stabililty adsl must die !
Quote:


Originally Posted by Traeumt
View Post

Using FIOS connection atm and i get around -10 ms lower than cable (100/5)Cable is the best For low latency and stabililty adsl must die !

The determination of ping is much larger than if you have cable or fiber. It's the ISP backbone that makes all the difference (and how good the routing is).
See less See more
Quote:


Originally Posted by low strife
View Post

The determination of ping is much larger than if you have cable or fiber. It's the ISP backbone that makes all the difference (and how good the routing is).

You are 100 percent right but if u make a technical enumeration its FIOS>CABLE>DSL (For home usage) correct me if am wrong .
See less See more
Quote:

Originally Posted by Traeumt View Post
You are 100 percent right but if u make a technical enumeration its FIOS>CABLE>DSL (For home usage) correct me if am wrong .
I've noticed that DSL has the technology to offer lower pings through the last mile, compared to Cable which usually travels through a lot of wiring.
See less See more
Quote:

Originally Posted by Traeumt View Post
You are 100 percent right but if u make a technical enumeration its FIOS>CABLE>DSL (For home usage) correct me if am wrong .
what kind of connection does fios use?

I live in The outback.
See less See more
2
Quote:

Originally Posted by tagurtoast View Post
what kind of connection does fios use?

I live in The outback.
FIber OpticS
See less See more
i enjoy my cable service... paying for 2*12/1 getting 2*32/2 with ~30ms latency to backbone servers ~400 miles away... and i'm behind 2 modems, a router and a switch...

can't wait for the docsis 3.0 upgrade... mmmm 2*50/5+
Quote:
there usually isnt a real difference IMO. I used to have dsl a while ago and switched to comcast cable internet, supposedly (5-10 mbps). DL speeds were maybe roughly 5-750 kbps, and only on comcast servers would i get speeds 1-2 mbps. I now have at & t dsl and its like exactly the same speed as comcast even though we have elite (supposedly 15- 20 mbps). They always lie about speeds, never have i had dl speeds even remotely close to what i pay for.
Thats a real bummer. I pay for 1mbps download on DSL and i get something like around 2mbps dl and 0.5 mbps ul when i check on speedtest.net
Generally, ISPs will only guarantee 40% of your advertised speeds. If you really think there's a problem somewhere, you need to keep calling and making civil complaints to your ISP. There's a good possibility that you will eliminate the possibility of being charged for checking their infrastructure, provided you work your way up to call center management.

The problem at hand, if it's not your modem, would most likely be the Catina card located at your neighborhood DSLAM (Pinto-sized box, beige/brown if with AT&T). Check around the neighborhood and see if other people are having the same problem, because if so, then it would be even closer to the telco's end of the line. If anything, you could borrow a modem to narrow down that it's not your problem, but your telco's.
Are people forgetting DSL is incredibly reliant on distance from the exchange

Graph
Quote:

Originally Posted by captthunderpnts View Post
(Pinto-sized box, beige/brown if with AT&T)
Regular DSLAMs are smaller than this, actually, it's usually the non-data remote terminals (outside of AT&T's territory) that are that large. I still don't understand how AT&T could make ADSL2+ equipment so huge...
See less See more
Quote:

Originally Posted by Marma Duke View Post
Are people forgetting DSL is incredibly reliant on distance from the exchange

Graph
Back in 1999, it was. There also used to be a 3 mile limit to DSL subscribers. Now, people as far as 20 miles from the local telephone exchange are receiving DSL service from new fiber drops and DSLAM installations.
See less See more
1 - 20 of 31 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top