Overclock.net banner

[TCM] Nvidia's new Quadro cards aim to please Autodesk fans

1293 Views 15 Replies 9 Participants Last post by  Frost
Quote:


Nvidia's new Quadro cards aim to please Autodesk fans

The still DX11-less Nvidia Corp. has now expanded its Quadro line of professional graphics cards with three new models - one for desktops (Quadro FX 380 LP) and two for mobiles platforms (Quadro FX 3800M and FX 2800M), which are claimed to boost productivity and enhance creativity of 3D design professionals using Autodesk applications like AutoCAD and 3ds Max.

First up, there's the Quadro FX 380 LP, a low-profile card with active cooling that costs $169 and features 16 Processing Cores, 512MB of memory on a 64-bit interface, DirectX 10.1 support, a power consumption of just 28W and both DVI and DisplayPort outputs.

As for the Quadro FX 3800M and FX 2800M, which are already being used by Dell for its Precision M6500 mobile workstation, they have 128 and 96 Processing Cores, respectively, boasts a 256-bit memory interface, 1GB of GDDR3 memory, and provide 30-bit color accuracy for display of over one billion colors.

Source
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
Nice. I'm drafting on a Radeon 2400XT. Maybe I can convince my boss I need a 380LP, so that my computer won't chug as hard on a 30 MB county map.
Quote:


Originally Posted by MrDeodorant
View Post

Nice. I'm drafting on a Radeon 2400XT. Maybe I can convince my boss I need a 380LP, so that my computer won't chug as hard on a 30 MB county map.

You can get an FX580 for nearly the same price. It's just not low profile.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...quadro%20fx580

The regular 380 is even cheaper, although I wouldn't really recommend such a low end card personally if you do any kind of 3D...

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814133274

The 580 is sufficient for most 3D CAD related tasks.

Maya on the other hand is a completely different beast.
See less See more
  • Rep+
Reactions: 1
Interesting. Thanks.
mmmm 1 bilion colors i wouldnt mind having that tho my monitor can only display what 16.2 million? also when did nvidia get dx 10.1 i thought that was a amd thing, and what even uses it?
2
Sadly, I'm drafting on a crappy fireGL.
Too bad I can't bring something from home or pick hardware for my work.

See less See more
Every day I'm on my drafting computer (q6600 + Radeon 2400XT) is a day I'm not on my other computer, a 1.7GHz Pentium 4 with 768MB of RAM and about 300MB of free space on the hard drive. I don't take it for granted, I just get frustrated when AutoCAD tells me it has 'run out of memory' and dies. Like when I need to delete 1 million+ property lines and forget to do it in little batches. That's not the video card's fault, but I could make this machine sing and dance if I could use hardware from home.
I feel for you guys drafting on slow comps, Im typing this on my workstation, a dell precision t7400 with dual xeons! yippee!
Nice. We were happy to get dual monitors.
Quote:


Originally Posted by MrDeodorant
View Post

Every day I'm on my drafting computer (q6600 + Radeon 2400XT) is a day I'm not on my other computer, a 1.7GHz Pentium 4 with 768MB of RAM and about 300MB of free space on the hard drive. I don't take it for granted, I just get frustrated when AutoCAD tells me it has 'run out of memory' and dies. Like when I need to delete 1 million+ property lines and forget to do it in little batches. That's not the video card's fault, but I could make this machine sing and dance if I could use hardware from home.

Get a card with more memory?

Low end cards that have a crapload of memory are very common.
See less See more
Well Im stuck on a single monitor, though, so you got me beat there. The engineering dept apparently deserves them but the arch dept doesnt.

On topic, I still dont see the reason to spend the ridiculous amounts of money on the quadros compared to gaming cards that do just as good, IMO.

This is especially true after seeing that other thread about raytracing using CUDA. They ran the demo on a GTX280...not a quadro.
Two is nice, but we all actually wish for three, so that we could have one for AutoCAD, one for Properties and Layers, and one for Outlook/Adobe.

Quote:


Originally Posted by sLowEnd
View Post

Get a card with more memory?

Low end cards that have a crapload of memory are very common.

It has 512 MB. I wouldn't mind the faster memory on the new cards, but that's not exactly a lightweight (in that one, single respect).
See less See more
Quote:

Originally Posted by sLowEnd View Post
Get a card with more memory?

Low end cards that have a crapload of memory are very common.
It's not a video card memory issue usually, it's either system memory or the fact that it's a 32bit application.

I use UGS NX daily and I regularly push 1-2gb memory usage per instance of NX, while running 2-3 instances at a time at minimum. Most of my memory issues deal with the fact that we're still using 32-bit XP, can't wait to move onto 64-bit Windows 7 with Core i7 workstations in a few months.
See less See more
i got a V8700 for sale in the for sale thread if u guys are interesdted
See less See more
Quote:


Originally Posted by MrDeodorant
View Post

Nice. I'm drafting on a Radeon 2400XT. Maybe I can convince my boss I need a 380LP, so that my computer won't chug as hard on a 30 MB county map.

Don't bother with a quadro if you are using AutoCAD. Like a lot of autodesk products it runs under DirectX so will see little benefit from using a workstation card over a gaming card. Indeed a good gaming card will walk all over the low end quadros. Maya & Revit are different as they still use OpenGL as their primary graphics API and thus benefit from the quadro cards more
See less See more
Thought that was an interesting way to start the read, "The still DX11-less Nvidia Corp" heh, Ive already moved on to ATI for my next build, tired of nvidia taking so long to actualy get somewhere with there technology. Not to mention the prices of there cards now make them completely worthless to purchase for the performance.
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top