keep the multiplyer the same, or it could make varie the benchmark. A higher multiplyer is faster then a higher fsb in real life performance
[TEST] Is fps a linear relationship with clock speed?
So, I've been hearing around that intel cpu's bottleneck a graphics card until around 2.6GHz, so I'm out to test this theory.
I'm going to be using an E7200 on a Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P motherboard, along with my 8800GT.
I'll start benchmarking at around 2.2GHz, then slowly wind it up to ~4Ghz, and record all the results.
One question though, do you think I should go early for a high fsb and low multiplier, then raise the multiplier as I go, or keep the multiplier the same and run the ram in linked mode, raising the fsb as I go? I'm going to be using 2x 1GB OCZ Gold PC2-8800 (1100MHz).
I'm going to be using an E7200 on a Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P motherboard, along with my 8800GT.
I'll start benchmarking at around 2.2GHz, then slowly wind it up to ~4Ghz, and record all the results.
One question though, do you think I should go early for a high fsb and low multiplier, then raise the multiplier as I go, or keep the multiplier the same and run the ram in linked mode, raising the fsb as I go? I'm going to be using 2x 1GB OCZ Gold PC2-8800 (1100MHz).
1 - 2 of 2 Posts
1 - 2 of 2 Posts
- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Overclock.net
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums
Top Contributors this Month
View All
HappySheep
334 Replies
wmdieselmc
194 Replies
Ichirou
192 Replies
Recommended Communities
