Overclock.net banner

Thinking of adding another WD Raptor 150gb for Raid 0

299 Views 9 Replies 7 Participants Last post by  CL3P20
Thoughts? Can my motherboard even support raid 0 or do I need a separate controller card?

What sort of performance gains could I expect? (I've never done a raid 0 config)

Anything faster in gaming/benchmarks? Aside from the typical increased speed in normal program usage, I am interested in pure performance. I am aware of the risk of raid 0, which is why I am trying to figure if I should

A.) For $125 add another Raptor 150gb
B.) For $75 get a Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 for storage and keep the games/OS on my current Raptor.
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Yeah, your board can do RAID-0. I'm not sure if your board has a dedicated controller chip like mine, but if it does, use that for RAID-0. Since it's dedicated to that, the theory is that it's safer for data protection. It would be called something like Jmicron or Silicon Image somewhere in your bios. If it doesn't have either of those, you can still do it on the southbridge. When you are posting the board, do CTRL-I and it will bring you into the ICH9R RAID controller where you can configure the drives.

As for performance, It does make a notable difference. I only have my games installed on my raptors since there's not fault tolerance and the risk of data corruption is substantially higher than with a standard single drive or RAID-1 (which is mirrored drives). It's pretty cool, because I'm usually the first one loaded up in servers and can get prime pick of the red team. lol.
Unfortunately the P35-DS3L only has the ICH9 Southbridge and not the ICH9R which supports RAID. So the answer is to buy a RAID controller card.

Here is the P35-DS3L (rev 2.0) product page:
http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Products/...ProductID=2629
  • Rep+
Reactions: 1
oh ok, sorry for the misinformation there. I was under the false impression that all p35's had ich9r.
Quote:

Originally Posted by slngsht View Post
oh ok, sorry for the misinformation there. I was under the false impression that all p35's had ich9r.
Its a common mistake. I only know because I have built a few RAID and non RAID systems with the Gigabyte P35 boards. So I got the DS3L for non RAID, and I got the DS3R for RAID.
See less See more
I would oppose the RAID choice as the benefits aren't that great compared to the cost of running ($125 HDD + $50+ RAID card for 150GB more). A single 1TB or 1.5TB for $120/$180 would be better I think.
Yeah the gain will be minimal at best. Id go with option B.
For reference: http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/394
I have 2 74gb raptors in raid 0 and honestly i dont think its much faster. And according to anandtech.com they have an article stating that in real world desktop performance its just the same but ill win u any benchmark ratings. http://www.anandtech.com/storage/sho...px?i=2101&p=11
two things for you, I would like to re-emphasize..

1.

Quote:
Since it's dedicated to that, the theory is that it's safer for data protection. It would be called something like Jmicron or Silicon Image somewhere in your bios.
Wrong..RAID_0 offers NO means of data security..only performance increases, since it has no redundancy for backup. RAID_1 would have redundancy at the cost of performance.

2. As mootsfox pointed out too.. a single 1TB HDD will actually outperform the RAID_0 in most app's, as the platter density is so tight.. latency times are drastically reduced. Granted there will be exceptions..but generally speaking the 1x TB HDD offers just aas much speed..without the negatives of data corruption or loss in the event of a system failure..

*Let me tell you from personal experience ...it only takes one bad restart to foul up a RAID_0..
See less See more
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top