Joined
·
4,973 Posts
Quote:
That's the best you can come up with? If you're going to use ad ad hominems at least use one that's not blatantly transparent.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I don't think anyone likes having someone essentially call them a blood sucking leech. That's totally not cool.

Quote:
Then why are you arguing?What peer studies have shown that there hasn't been massive waste in climate research spending? All the research is fairly conclusive.
Quote:
You have no idea what is involved in my political ideals. Don't kid yourself. More ad hominems. Stop it. It's bad form and it invalidates your argument, regardless if you're right or not.We need to spend more money doing than paying the climate change industry for a whole lot of unnecessary redundancy. Your political idealism is blinding common sense.
Quote:
I'll give you that, I read through your posts. It wasn't you who was doing the denying. It was a different user. Sorry.People like me denying what? You're an ..... yeah. Global pollution is one of the largest issues humanity will ever face. Where did I deny anything?
Quote:
You know, I was going to be nice and just tell you to stop attacking me personally. But after the obvious and purposeful implication that I'm a blood sucking leech, I'm just going to report you. You're an adult and you know better. And so do I which is why I'm ending this converastion here.There are blood sucking leeches wasting government grant money on redundant and pointless studies. Thank you for being part of the problem of excessive waste.![]()
I don't think anyone likes having someone essentially call them a blood sucking leech. That's totally not cool.