possibly cool and quiet on?
1 - 20 of 36 Posts
Quote:
at 2.4ghz? I don't think so.
Originally Posted by Collins00 possibly cool and quiet on? |
Quote:
The biggest thing I gather is the increased L2 cache per core compared to the current gen processors.
Originally Posted by Alatar and what useful info we can actually gather from that image? Half the readings are probably not right because CPU-z isn't supporting these yet. |
Quote:
no its the mobile socket...
Originally Posted by _Chimera Well, 2.4Ghz @ ~0.4v, single-core&single thread with 1Mb L2 cache. Could be false due to cpu-z? And btw, is that a 4 processor mobo? |
Quote:
Ah right, thanks !
Originally Posted by darksideleader no its the mobile socket... |
I think this will make a great little HTPC
![]()
single core??? 
in this age, i think the minimum is 2 cores, 2 threads.
in this age, i think the minimum is 2 cores, 2 threads.
Quote:
Probably CPU-z error. Single-core for the mobile end are reserved for <10W APUs alla AMDs C-Series.
Originally Posted by james8 single core??? in this age, i think the minimum is 2 cores, 2 threads. |
Quote:
Even if cool'n'quiet were on that is super super low
Originally Posted by Collins00 possibly cool and quiet on? |
Quote:
They're not 'dozer cores. They're Llano. I.e. The 32nm die shrink of the current Phenom IIs + up to 400 SPs.
Originally Posted by obsidian86 looks like cpu z seems to be having trouble identifying the dozer cores |
Voltage shock!
![]()
2
Quote:
It must not be right.. the lowest I have seen with Cool n' Quiet with my Zacate is in the .6v range. No way this would be any lower.
Originally Posted by hollowtek Voltage shock!
|
Quote:
Well it's smaller architecture.. So yes, it could.
Originally Posted by CryWin It must not be right.. the lowest I have seen with Cool n' Quiet with my Zacate is in the .6v range. No way this would be any lower. |
1 - 20 of 36 Posts
