No
Different naming scheme. They are doing the same thing with their GPUs.
Different naming scheme. They are doing the same thing with their GPUs.
http://www.techoftomorrow.com/2013/pc/amd-fx-9590-kiss-of-death-last-fx-cpu-from-amd/It seems as though rumors are floating around causing speculation as to whether AMD's latest offering, the heartily priced FX -9590, will be the last FX CPU AMD Produces.
try to formate your thread in better and add the source to your title. Also remeber you can make source as LinkOriginally Posted by PCBuilder94
http://www.techoftomorrow.com/2013/pc/amd-fx-9590-kiss-of-death-last-fx-cpu-from-amd/
Found this article pretty interesting...
2010rig what movie is your avatar from?
The Phenom architecture hit its wall. They had 32nm cores and they were not better than their 45nm counterparts. With that no, I personally would not like to see them do something like put old cores on a new fab and just jam a few more in there.
hmm, not sure what the source is, I've looked but haven't found it.
If we measure performance in flops, they've got plenty