The 6800 gs should be much better according to this chart
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...rd,2464-8.html
(its 8 tiers higher)
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...rd,2464-8.html
(its 8 tiers higher)
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Thanks Scottery, +rep.
Quote:
The specs for the computer state this, "NVIDIA GeForce 9100 Graphics with 256MB integrated shared graphics memory. Up to 3838MB Total Available Graphics Memory as allocated by Windows® 7".
Here is a link to the PDF of the computer in question:
http://slickdeals.net/forums/attachm...5&d=1258218417
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieHo Nvidia 9100? What is that? Are you sure it's not the 9100M? |
Here is a link to the PDF of the computer in question:
http://slickdeals.net/forums/attachm...5&d=1258218417
2
Quote:
It must be an OEM only design... based on the 9100M specs, it's crap.
Quote:
A 6800 would be better.
Quote:
Most do. (AMD's HD3xxx/4xxx IGP have optional dedicated 128MB Sideport memory.) More importantly, system memory access is much slower than dedicated graphics memory.
Originally Posted by QuinnMallory Thanks Scottery, +rep. The specs for the computer state this, "NVIDIA GeForce 9100 Graphics with 256MB integrated shared graphics memory. Up to 3838MB Total Available Graphics Memory as allocated by Windows® 7". Here is a link to the PDF of the computer in question: http://slickdeals.net/forums/attachm...5&d=1258218417 |
Quote:
8 Stream Processors. 450 MHz core clock. 1100 MHz shader clock. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Scott Doesn't onboard graphics use memory from the RAM, thus making you have less RAM available for other things?...I'd use the 6800. |
now you need to get your friend Oc'ing
![]()
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
