[vr-zone] Bay Trail-T coming September 11
1 - 20 of 23 Posts
Joined
·
5,308 Posts
About flipping time Intel........
*reads
2.4Ghz, 2W chips with 2560x1600 screens.........
I'd be happy with the 1.8GHz and 1920x1200 tbh.
Forget surpassing, if they can just match the current clover trail battery life with those kinds of specs, it would be very nice indeed.
*reads
2.4Ghz, 2W chips with 2560x1600 screens.........
I'd be happy with the 1.8GHz and 1920x1200 tbh.
Forget surpassing, if they can just match the current clover trail battery life with those kinds of specs, it would be very nice indeed.
Quote:
The benefit of HT is there something like a 5-10% transistor cost but a possibility of up to a 40% gain in certain heavily threaded applications.
Inclusion of HT really depends on usage.... for smartphones/tablets, I would think 4-cores is enough that HT would not provide enough benefit to be worth it. However, on microserver, Atoms probably will have HT even with 4-cores.
OoOE and HyperThreading are not tied together though?Originally Posted by Dapman02
It all depends if these processor's support's out of order execution. The biggest reason why they even bothered with it on the Atoms is the lack of out of order execution.
The benefit of HT is there something like a 5-10% transistor cost but a possibility of up to a 40% gain in certain heavily threaded applications.
Inclusion of HT really depends on usage.... for smartphones/tablets, I would think 4-cores is enough that HT would not provide enough benefit to be worth it. However, on microserver, Atoms probably will have HT even with 4-cores.
Joined
·
11,389 Posts
Quote:
Bay Trail are "out of order" CPUsOriginally Posted by Dapman02
It all depends if these processor's support's out of order execution. The biggest reason why they even bothered with it on the Atoms is the lack of out of order execution.
Joined
·
774 Posts
Looks competitive but not earth shattering.
Geekbench:
z3770 (under windows 8.1):
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/2068301
exynos 5:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/2229052
Geekbench:
z3770 (under windows 8.1):
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/2068301
exynos 5:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/2229052
Joined
·
6,330 Posts
Quote:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/2226937
Weird. Seems like a newer revision but I still find it odd that the performance could be so much higher. Are these even legitimate benchmarks?
There's another oneOriginally Posted by MrJava
Looks competitive but not earth shattering.
Geekbench:
z3770 (under windows 8.1):
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/2068301
exynos 5:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/2229052
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/2226937
Weird. Seems like a newer revision but I still find it odd that the performance could be so much higher. Are these even legitimate benchmarks?
Joined
·
5,437 Posts
Quote:
![rolleyes.gif]()
Does ARM SOC makers even list a TDP/SDP?Originally Posted by Usario
Why can't Intel give us the TDP numbers instead of insisting on sticking with their SDP scam?
"uh, we think, for most people, in most systems, that it will put out this much heat, usually"
Joined
·
11,389 Posts
Quote:
what's more important for your average consumer product? A TDP rating comparable to somebody Folding @Home or a TDP rating representative of the average user workload? (internet browsing, small gaming, media consumption etc...)Originally Posted by Usario
Why can't Intel give us the TDP numbers instead of insisting on sticking with their SDP scam?![rolleyes.gif]()
"uh, we think, for most people, in most systems, that it will put out this much heat, usually"
Joined
·
10,262 Posts
I expected a lot of 9/11 jokes but OK.
Should be a pretty sweet addition especially compared to current atoms.
Should be a pretty sweet addition especially compared to current atoms.
Joined
·
1,174 Posts
Quote:
if they are real its probably an Es, its only running @ 1.46ghzOriginally Posted by geoxile
There's another one
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/2226937
Weird. Seems like a newer revision but I still find it odd that the performance could be so much higher. Are these even legitimate benchmarks?
Quote:
There will be embedded and server lines as well. Those will support more memory.Originally Posted by kevinf
Teh ram limit is the real killer here... these would make great embedded processors, if and only if, they could have more ram, and good linux driver support...
Joined
·
3,848 Posts
Quote:
Forgive my ignorance, but what is the benefit of an embedded server part?Originally Posted by DuckieHo
There will be embedded and server lines as well. Those will support more memory.
Joined
·
10,262 Posts
Quote:
only of the screens the laptop itself can usually do more.Originally Posted by Bitech
Funny how the min resolution on these new Atoms is the max resolution for most ordinary laptops.
1 - 20 of 23 Posts
Join the discussion
Join now to ask and comment!