[ThePath]

Quote:

Bay Trail-T will come in four models: the Z3770, Z3770D, Z3740 and Z3740D. All of which are quad-core chips. The "D" processors, the Z3770D and the Z3740D, will support resolutions up to 1920×1200, while the non "D" chips, the Z3770 and Z3740 will support resolutions up to 2560 x 1600.

Read more: http://vr-zone.com/articles/bay-trail-t-coming-september-11/49425.html#ixzz2b6yAROjH

 

[GrizzleBoy]

About flipping time Intel........

*reads

2.4Ghz, 2W chips with 2560x1600 screens.........

I'd be happy with the 1.8GHz and 1920x1200 tbh.

Forget surpassing, if they can just match the current clover trail battery life with those kinds of specs, it would be very nice indeed.

 

[ThePath]

It is 2w SDP

sdp is usually about 2/3's of the tdp.

 

[DuckieHo]

No HyperThreading on these, I assume?

 

[Dapman02]

Quote:

Originally Posted by DuckieHo

No HyperThreading on these, I assume?

It all depends if these processor's support's out of order execution. The biggest reason why they even bothered with it on the Atoms is the lack of out of order execution.

 

[DuckieHo]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dapman02

It all depends if these processor's support's out of order execution. The biggest reason why they even bothered with it on the Atoms is the lack of out of order execution.

OoOE and HyperThreading are not tied together though?

The benefit of HT is there something like a 5-10% transistor cost but a possibility of up to a 40% gain in certain heavily threaded applications.

Inclusion of HT really depends on usage.... for smartphones/tablets, I would think 4-cores is enough that HT would not provide enough benefit to be worth it. However, on microserver, Atoms probably will have HT even with 4-cores.

 

[lacrossewacker]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dapman02

It all depends if these processor's support's out of order execution. The biggest reason why they even bothered with it on the Atoms is the lack of out of order execution.

Bay Trail are "out of order" CPUs

 

[MrJava]

Looks competitive but not earth shattering.

Geekbench:

z3770 (under windows 8.1):
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/2068301

exynos 5:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/2229052

 

[Usario]

Why can't Intel give us the TDP numbers instead of insisting on sticking with their SDP scam?

"uh, we think, for most people, in most systems, that it will put out this much heat, usually"

 

[geoxile]

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrJava

Looks competitive but not earth shattering.

Geekbench:

z3770 (under windows 8.1):
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/2068301

exynos 5:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/2229052

There's another one

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/2226937

Weird. Seems like a newer revision but I still find it odd that the performance could be so much higher. Are these even legitimate benchmarks?

 

[sherlock]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Usario

Why can't Intel give us the TDP numbers instead of insisting on sticking with their SDP scam?

"uh, we think, for most people, in most systems, that it will put out this much heat, usually"

Does ARM SOC makers even list a TDP/SDP?

 

[lacrossewacker]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Usario

Why can't Intel give us the TDP numbers instead of insisting on sticking with their SDP scam?

"uh, we think, for most people, in most systems, that it will put out this much heat, usually"

what's more important for your average consumer product? A TDP rating comparable to somebody Folding @Home or a TDP rating representative of the average user workload? (internet browsing, small gaming, media consumption etc...)

 

[james8]

at least they even list a power number. Ask Samsung, Qualcomm, or Apple and see if they'll give you any number at all

 

[maarten12100]

I expected a lot of 9/11 jokes but OK.
Should be a pretty sweet addition especially compared to current atoms.

 

[DarkBlade6]

Quote:

Originally Posted by geoxile

There's another one

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/2226937

Weird. Seems like a newer revision but I still find it odd that the performance could be so much higher. Are these even legitimate benchmarks?

if they are real its probably an Es, its only running @ 1.46ghz

 

[kevinf]

Teh ram limit is the real killer here... these would make great embedded processors, if and only if, they could have more ram, and good linux driver support...

 

[DuckieHo]

Quote:

Originally Posted by kevinf

Teh ram limit is the real killer here... these would make great embedded processors, if and only if, they could have more ram, and good linux driver support...

There will be embedded and server lines as well. Those will support more memory.

 

[SectorNine50]

Quote:

Originally Posted by DuckieHo

There will be embedded and server lines as well. Those will support more memory.

Forgive my ignorance, but what is the benefit of an embedded server part?

 

[Bitech]

Funny how the min resolution on these new Atoms is the max resolution for most ordinary laptops.

 

[maarten12100]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bitech

Funny how the min resolution on these new Atoms is the max resolution for most ordinary laptops.

only of the screens the laptop itself can usually do more.