Joined
·
4,613 Posts
Source;This was an implementation decision made during Microsoft's Windows NT kernel design, and based on our experiences with both processor vendors' hardware, it wasn't considered a "feature" to either company. Of course, it affected Intel in a much different way than AMD. The problem Intel had in Vista was one of power consumption. For every migration, you had to write-combine the Nehalem architecture's L3 cache, which cost power.
This changes with Windows 7 and a feature called ideal core. If a task's needs are being addressed by one core, the operating system will let you stay there. This means two things to Intel: first, you don't use power on the migration, and second, idle cores are able to remain in a C6 state. Purportedly, this migration fix alone will yield an extra 10 to 15 minutes of battery life on Nehalem-based notebooks, though this won't become a major issue until the mobile dual-core Arrandale launches later this year. Perhaps more interesting, though, is that processors without C6 will not realize this gain (including AMD's CPUs)."
so it basically turns the other cores in a sort of sleep mode if one or two are enough for the task?Originally Posted by Gunderman456
Source;
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fx-8150-zambezi-bulldozer-990fx,3043-7.html
Could you explain a little more what you mean by "...CPU no longer knows how much power it consumes"? I always thought that the VRMs handled how much power to deliver to the CPU and that the CPU never really "knew" how much power it was or wasn't consuming. Your statement makes me believe that I am totally wrong.
Likewise if you disable APM(Master) feature from the bios, it will essentially disable Turbo.
Killing APM will kill the power management and after that the CPU no longer knows how much power it consumes.