Senior Moderater ira-K put the whole idea in perspective when he stated $3-500 for 10c-15c in a cpu only loop. This is a lot of cash (and I spent it). I am just about to say high end air for cpu only. It has been stated frequently here that 4.0ghz stable with a i7 920 on air happens all the time.
If you bring in gpu cooling also it makes more sense but $160.00 SLI capable waterblocks for my 275 really tugs at the budget.
The only way I can justify the WC hobby is to place value on the fun of doing it. How do others feel?
Originally Posted by sdla4ever
ive put in like 300-450. and my loop cools both CPU and GPU and i guarantee there is no people running 1.45vcore on air on a i7
WC isn't worth it. You will probably reach 4 GHz on an i7 920 with a good HSF that might cost $80 max. With watercooling, you might reach 4.4 GHz or higher, but you need to spend 100's of dollars for the waterblock, radiator, tubing, reservoir, pump, etc. You also need to make sure that nothing grows in your loop which requires more maintenance than cleaning dust out of your case.
Watercooling a GPU is too expensive, as you usually upgrade GPU's every 2 years, and then the waterblock you bought (unless it's a universal one) is useless.
It's only worth it to WC if you want to get that extra 500 points in a pointless benchmark, or if you have 3 GPU's and want them to keep cool.
sdla, How did you ever fit two GPU water blocks in that budget? good prices on used parts maybe?
I want a GPU block bad as my XFX card can't stand any type of 3D OC without locking up in Crysis. No OC and it runs fine in the 40+ fps range. It will easily hit 59C gaming.
overclocking graphics cards doesnt do too much, results arent as noticable. if you're getting only 20 frames, youd need a 50% OC to get into the playable area, provided you dont run into bandwidth related bottlenecks. if you're getting 30 already, then youve got enough to not need to OC. it can be a lot of fun to do, but purely for performance that 160$ isnt worth it.
for CPU's its a different matter, depending on the task obviously. CPU's can OC further than just 50% these days and the effects per % are more noticable as well. for example when you're extracting a file archive. pretty much any CPU intensive task will get done a lot faster. sadly for us watercooling enthousiasts, the need for this expensive form of cooling is decreasing, still. CPU's will reach higher clocks on air as aircoolers get much better, and the chip's effective OCing range has shifted more into the aircooling territory the past few years. so sadly, again, from a bang-for-buck standpoint it is not really worth it in most cases. It is a lot of fun to do, and is more forgiving for higher voltages. Highers OCs are noticable in real world results, but enough to warrant the premium? maybe the 200$ of a simple CPU loop, but much over that and you'd have to do it for fun, or the lower temps that while they dont increase overclockability much, can ensure a longer lifetime of the hardware, and stable operation even during the summer.
i'm going to wcing just for my cpu, for what I pay for a megahalem with clips I wanted and fans, I could just get a heatkiller 3.0. The tubing and pump and other things.. I can get while I use my stock intel cooler and don't overclock until then.
I think it just depends on if you have the mindset to do it. I'm definitly doing it to try something I haven't and because it looks to definitly be "fun" how original some people can make their wcing systems.
Chiel, So am I done then? I made a WC rig and I am always tweaking it (not because its broke but because its fun) What I am getting at, is one's enough to get the WC experience and all others should go on air? (I have a Q6600 build for a Photoshop backup rig in progress).
Perhaps you will say go WC because its a Q6600, and for high cpu mhz it will be a hot runner. I could keep my Q6600 as a CS3 PhotoShop backup rig (no OC as mobo is Intel) and go i7 for the second CS4 Photoshop rig as I know I could stick with air on the i7 920. But then you get into the reported better rendering performance of AMD chips (I also have another ASUS board I could OC another Phenom II with),so I just don't know.
A lot of the intrigue with water-cooling comes after your first loop that's just "adequate"; it's true that there will be comparable air-cooling parts but when you get to the level of fanaticism that many who post worklogs here and at XS exhibit, it becomes much more of an art than just another form of cooling.
There's little to worry about with air-cooling and air-cooling can be applied to many systems and look good. It takes a lot of work to make a water-cooling loop look satisfactory, function as desired and run as quiet or as efficient as possible. It's this desire that push many to pursue water cooling past their first drop; many drop out but many also stay around and put in the effort to turn their computers into works of art and things of beauty.
For me, water cooling inspires innovation, and provides me a creative outlet that otherwise (I'm terrible at the arts) would never have manifested in myself. So the pursuit of water-cooling may start out with just a desire for lower temperatures but as you get deeper and deeper into the art, examining the work of others, it begins to evolve into a much more stringent pursuit of perfection - one which has been captured time and time again (murder mods and MDPCs) but never completely satisfies everyone.
I feel that water cooling is never, under any circumstances, worth it from a cost / performance point of view. This is coming from someone who's put probably over $800 into water cooling and related parts. I can see it being worth the money if you have a requirement for or obsession with a quiet, high performance computer, or if you absolutely need to eek that last bit of performance out of your computer.
WC does cost a pretty penny, I'm in the same boat. I couldn't justify spending 300-400 right now so I bought a mega shadow to get me to 4.0ghz. However the WC part in me still wants to come out. I will probably have a WC setup by the end of dec...whenever I feel like it's not worth it to WC, I look at this:
Well thanks to all, you have inspired me to keep at it and change from a cost effective view point to an art form view point. +rep to all because you have all taken the time too write and perhaps inspire others.
Well thanks to all, you have inspired me to keep at it and change from a cost effective view point to an art form view point. +rep to all because you have all taken the time too write and perhaps inspire others.
You're very welcome
Just remember, do what YOU want in your system, regardless of cost( reasonable cost I mean/ affordable ). As long as you are happy with it, that is all that should matter imo.
Personally I feel a solid HSF in the $40-80 price range beats any WC system in the bang/buck market by far, especially after you factor in time spent maintaining a WC system, and issue that may arrise during upgrades (ie incompatible blocks).
Personally, if you're the kind of person that sprung for an i7 920 over the 950/960 because of value, then WC's prob not for you. You'd spend as much or less on a 960 overclock with a good air HFC and mobo than you would on a WC'd 920 system and end up with comparable performance at best.
WC and the like are really only for the people that demand the absolute most out of their equipment, regardless the cost. Sure, there's something to be said for the quiet, near unparalled performance of a WC system (Compared to an air cooling variant), as well as the general fun of tweaking/modding your system if that happens to be your thing, but it's simply not cost efficient by any stretch of the imagination.
WC isn't worth it. You will probably reach 4 GHz on an i7 920 with a good HSF that might cost $80 max. With watercooling, you might reach 4.4 GHz or higher, but you need to spend 100's of dollars for the waterblock, radiator, tubing, reservoir, pump, etc. You also need to make sure that nothing grows in your loop which requires more maintenance than cleaning dust out of your case.
Watercooling a GPU is too expensive, as you usually upgrade GPU's every 2 years, and then the waterblock you bought (unless it's a universal one) is useless.
It's only worth it to WC if you want to get that extra 500 points in a pointless benchmark, or if you have 3 GPU's and want them to keep cool.
Any watercooling system that requires more manteinance than change coolant once a year it's not well built.
Also, Air cooling will only blow ALL the air inside your case... unless you have some crazy airflow, the hot air will be sucked again...
Watercool is totally worth it's 200€ when you want to cool everything with the heat outside of the case. 210€ costed my loop.
If I wanted to go air, 80€ for Heatsink on CPU, 50 for each GPU HSF + 10 for fans... That's 200. For 10€ more, I can have watercooling.
Okay if you prefer air cooling. But from there to say "Watercooling is totally not worth it", you lose totally your argument.
Originally Posted by PCCstudent
Chiel, So am I done then? I made a WC rig and I am always tweaking it (not because its broke but because its fun) What I am getting at, is one's enough to get the WC experience and all others should go on air? (I have a Q6600 build for a Photoshop backup rig in progress).
Perhaps you will say go WC because its a Q6600, and for high cpu mhz it will be a hot runner. I could keep my Q6600 as a CS3 PhotoShop backup rig (no OC as mobo is Intel) and go i7 for the second CS4 Photoshop rig as I know I could stick with air on the i7 920. But then you get into the reported better rendering performance of AMD chips (I also have another ASUS board I could OC another Phenom II with),so I just don't know.
No, i wont tell you to put all others on air. Theres something about WC that makes me not wanna go back to air. Aircooling is a lack of dedication, to computers, to engineering, and to technology in general. Watercooling is something you must build yourself, you get involved. You dont just install it. It gets personal.
I know it sounds stupid, but I think it is important to love your computer, almost like a person. You try to take good care of it, and hope it trusts you enough to do so. Try to cool it as well as you can and hope it trusts you with the risk of a leak. Also on the software side, install a good AV and keep it clean. Just like a person, a computer isnt perfect and you've got to respect that. Dont hate it for every little error, or crash. If you do that, I find them to listen to you a lot better, and care about you too.
Many people hated Vista, and the more they hated, the more it crashed. Vista has always been far more stable for me than XP, even at release. I loved Vista, and I guess Vista loved me back. I never had any of the trouble other people had, I couldnt even cause those problems on purpose. With XP that was the other way around. We hated eachother. Many of my problems I never heard anyone else about. And watercooling is similar to that. Just love it, and care for it, and it will not hurt you, it will not leak, and it'll be the best addition to your PC there is. It'll help you care for your other components, so that they will work for you too.
That said, I love my 8800GTX, but I wont ever watercool it. I wouldnt even dare take the cooler off, and I dont OC it. It doesnt like that. I respect it's wishes and in return it has always worked hard for me, and I hope it will keep doing so in the future.
ah, look at me rambling
anyway, watercooling is all about love, not just raw performance. There are many ways of showing it, but this is one of them.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could
be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Overclock.net
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!