I had the first one, they are preety OC-able as far as I remember. A friend says the Ati Rage has a better 2D image quality, but I doubt it. Performance-wise your FX5200 is far better anyway.
Which is better
Whats better, a GF2 mx400 or a ATI Rage Pro? (all the info I have)
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
The MX400 is better. Wow, never thought I would ever say that...
yeah I'd stick with the fx 5200, not an ideal card in itself but better than the ones mentioned.
The MX400 is the better of the 2 but as above the FX5200 is better than both
mx440 is a better card, I am guessing that you are asking this for informational reasons, I do hope your not downgrading your card.
Erm.. Its not for me. Its my sister. ill try to get more info on her card she has now (the mx400) I think it has 16mb of RAM while the Rage Pro has 32.
get a nvidia tnt2. ioverclocked my dads to 155/ 195
definately the mx400. im on a 440 and i can play CS:S decently. lol =D
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Overclock.net
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums
Top Contributors this Month
View All
HappySheep
367 Replies
GRABibus
206 Replies
Ichirou
201 Replies
Recommended Communities
