Overclock.net banner

What resolution do you prefer while gaming?

  • 1440x900 (16:10)

    Votes: 2 1.1%
  • 1600x900 (16:9)

    Votes: 10 5.7%
  • 1680x1050 (16:10)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1600x1200 (4:3)

    Votes: 77 44.3%
  • 1920x1080 (16:9)

    Votes: 18 10.3%
  • 1920x1200 (16:10)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2134x1600 (4:3)

    Votes: 33 19.0%
  • 2560x1440 (16:9)

    Votes: 17 9.8%
  • 2560x1600 (16:10)

    Votes: 7 4.0%
  • Eyefinity / Surround (16:9 Landscape)

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • Eyefinity / Surround (16:10 Landscape)

    Votes: 5 2.9%
  • Eyefinity / Surround (16:9 Portrait)

    Votes: 3 1.7%
  • Eyefinity / Surround (16:10 Portrait)

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • PLP (only applicable usually for 1600x1200 (P) / 2560x1600 (L) / 1600x1200 (P)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 20 of 90 Posts

·
Audiofool
Joined
·
3,486 Posts
If I had the money for it, I'd have 5 21.5" 1080p displays mounted vertically side by side. That would be 5400x1920 with an aspect ratio of 45:16.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
32,942 Posts
Thread cleaned, poll edited to be a lot less biased (I did leave out most 4:3 and 5:4 ratios simply because they are so outdated, but I left the higher ones). Also voted for PLP. However I don't have my side monitors yet, so I probably should've voted for 2560x1600 or 16:10.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,419 Posts
Honestly - So long as I can see my game and play without issue I could care less about the resolution. I will say that I dislike 1366 x 768 and 1440 x 900. Generally 1600 x 900, 1680 x 1050, 1920 x 1080 and 1920 x 1200 are my favorites. I've never been able to experience 1440p or 1600p - but i've also never owned a video card with more than 1GB of VRAM
 

·
Enthusiast Gamer
Joined
·
3,829 Posts
2560x1440 is amazing once you get it, it has lower pixel pitch/higher PPI then 2560x1600. Which is what made me choose it.

16:9 over 16:10 for gaming any day of the week.

If I was rich I would do 7680x1440.
 

·
I like computers
Joined
·
7,546 Posts


There's my setup - a 32" 1920x1080 alongside a 24" 1920x1200. I ALWAYS game on the 5 year old 24", because it is a much better experience. Of course, in my opinion, but that's all this thread amounts to anyway, is opinion. The 32" is basically for watching movies, and that's about it, unless I am "working". And Hydros, most of us already know you just make these threads to make sure everyone knows that 16:9 is superior, even though it's not. Because, that's just like...your opinion, man.

And also, the poll is practically useless since the majority of cheap displays are 1920x1080, so almost everyone and their grandma has used one, but very few have used 1920x1200 and above. So of course 1920x1080 will get the most votes in the poll. But what does it mean?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,820 Posts
1920 x 1080
16:9 is where it's at! Most games/fullscreen programs are made for 16:9 and you get a wider view.
All newer games support 1920x1080 usually, that and a 1920x1080 monitor is fairly cheap nowadays!
smile.gif


It's also the perfect size for videos!
 

·
Enthusiast Gamer
Joined
·
3,829 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oubadah View Post

2560x1440>2560x1600>1920x1200>1920x1080
Fixed
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,428 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron_Henderson View Post

And also, the poll is practically useless since the majority of cheap displays are 1920x1080, so almost everyone and their grandma has used one, but very few have used 1920x1200 and above.
Yeah, It looks like the majority of the voters saw "what do you use" or "what is affordable/practical to you" rather than "what do you prefer'. I can't imagine many people would 'prefer' 1920x1080 over 2560x1440 if they had the money to buy, and the power to drive the latter.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
16,904 Posts
I run a 27' 2560x1440 screen but I'd take a a 30 inch 2560x1600 one over it any day if the korean monitors weren't so cheap (or if the 30 inch korean versions would have been released earlier). With a 2560x1600 screen you can always just change your resolution to 2560x1440 if you need 16:9 for some strange reason.

Fun fact for the 16:9 crowd: Using 2560x1440/1600 as examples, while the x1440 screen will have a bigger field of view in games the x1600 screen will have more pixels dedicated for each object on the screen which means more detail.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,563 Posts
I play 1920x1200. Never notices the black borders left and right of the screen???

If I could pay it, I play highest possible x highest posible... Ain't that logic???!!!
tongue.gif
 

·
I like computers
Joined
·
7,546 Posts
Don't ruin the 16:9 fun, Alatar, by saying you can still run unscaled 16:9 resolutions on nearly EVERY 16;10 monitor. You just get a 60 pixel height black bar on the top and bottom.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,098 Posts
I love 1920x1080, purely for the fact I can afford it. I see no reason to fork out three times as much cash for 1440P, when 1080P is perfectly fine.

Also, 16:9 is superior to everything!
 

·
I like computers
Joined
·
7,546 Posts
And with this field of view stuff, would three 1024x768 monitors in Surround/Eyefinity be even more superior than 1920x1080? If the largest field of view is the most important feature of a display, I guess it would be. But I think there is more to it than that...
 
1 - 20 of 90 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top