Their performance vs cost ratio is terrible.... A 9600GT, 9600GSO, HD4830, ect are a bit more but a few times more powerful.
Did you at least get a GDDR3 version?
Did you at least get a GDDR3 version?
Zotac 9500GT
1 - 20 of 62 Posts
Quote:
Yeah I agree. How much did you buy this for? An nVidia 79XX series or ATI x19XX series would have performed similar or better for much less.
It's also comparable to a 7900GS.
Originally Posted by DuckieHo  Their performance vs cost ratio is terrible.... A 9600GT, 9600GSO, HD4830, ect are a bit more but a few times more powerful. Did you at least get a GDDR3 version? |
It's also comparable to a 7900GS.
Quote:
At what resolution?
![]()
A 9400GT can't play FO3 at decent settings at standard LCD settings....
Originally Posted by JMT668 it was 44 quid!! not bad i tought. my mate has a 9400GT and that will play Fallout3 on med |
A 9400GT can't play FO3 at decent settings at standard LCD settings....
2
Quote:
Didn't Ebuyer have an 8800GS for 55 quid not too long ago? That would have been at least two times better.
Originally Posted by JMT668 it was 44 quid!! not bad i tought. my mate has a 9400GT and that will play Fallout3 on med |
Quote:
Even though it is 2-3 times slower?
![]()
Originally Posted by JMT668 im sticking with nvidia! |
2
Quote:
True... but an inefficent use of money is still an inefficent use of money. For the same money, you can get 6-8 times the performance but instead you got 3 times the performance.
Originally Posted by JMT668 anything is a massive step up from a 7300LE!! |
1 - 20 of 62 Posts
