U need 1,016m for a 360° turn ????Originally Posted by Ramla777
Around 40inches per 360 cs/css/quakelive. http://www.zowiegear.dk/ is where it was ordered from.
Interests me just how much variance there is in what speeds people can reach. Some can hit high speeds at medium sensitivities. Edit: As in, 10in/360ish, not yours.Originally Posted by Ramla777
Around 40inches per 360 cs/css/quakelive. http://www.zowiegear.dk/ is where it was ordered from.
Thanks for your review,Originally Posted by Ramla777
Around 40inches per 360 cs/css/quakelive. http://www.zowiegear.dk/ is where it was ordered from.
In the review he said he could/would switch to the AM if it's tracking speed was a bit higher, so I'm guessing anywhere from 3.5-4 m/s. Guessing is pretty much all you can do, as I doubt there's something you could leave running while you game that would keep track of that.
he may hit them with 40"/360 but i dont know if he meant centimeters cause 40 inches is the slowest i heard of.Originally Posted by scandalous
The perfect control speeds don't seem that bad to me at all. Well except the 1150 one. But In perspective this thing's perfect control speed is twice as high as the popular intelli 1.1 and 3.0 from microsoft.
According to this http://www.esreality.com/?a=longpost&id=1265679&page=14 It's perfect control speed is even higher than the mx518, which I personally could never make skip even once nor hit negative accel on.
When actually gaming (normally) do you hit those speeds you mentioned?
sujoy [ESR] tested the mx518 at 1600dpi, its sensor is 400-800cpi native, if he tested at lower dpi then the max perfect control speed would be much higherOriginally Posted by scandalous
The perfect control speeds don't seem that bad to me at all. Well except the 1150 one. But In perspective this thing's perfect control speed is twice as high as the popular intelli 1.1 and 3.0 from microsoft.
According to this http://www.esreality.com/?a=longpost&id=1265679&page=14 It's perfect control speed is even higher than the mx518, which I personally could never make skip even once nor hit negative accel on.
When actually gaming (normally) do you hit those speeds you mentioned?
518 (A3080) should be 400-1600 native w/ counts halved from 1600 to produce a 800 CPI step.
There's no point comparing these with Sujoy's results. Most likely Ramla tested with a software program like Enotus, which is highly inaccurate.Originally Posted by scandalous
The perfect control speeds don't seem that bad to me at all. Well except the 1150 one. But In perspective this thing's perfect control speed is twice as high as the popular intelli 1.1 and 3.0 from microsoft.
According to this http://www.esreality.com/?a=longpost&id=1265679&page=14 It's perfect control speed is even higher than the mx518, which I personally could never make skip even once nor hit negative accel on.
I was just about to post this. Using enotus on my 1600DPI MX518 the 800 and 1600 steps match Sujoy's findings but at 400 DPI it can track at twice that speed.
That means Sujoy's testing is kinda flawed as his test only represent max resolutions.Originally Posted by Derp
I was just about to post this. Using enotus on my 1600DPI MX518 the 800 and 1600 steps match Sujoy's findings but at 400 DPI it can track at twice that speed.
I think its unfortunate to hear that the button problem WAS real just like the Mico and that the perfect control speed is still less than that of much older mice. I'm still going to throw $60 at Zowie though, even If I have to file the buttons down and be forced to use the 2300 CPI step.