fury kills the 980ti in this game at 1080pOriginally Posted by PureBlackFire
the Fury is a great value. it really matches the 980ti at 4k.
It's beta, they didn't add the Game(don't)works in yet.Originally Posted by flopper
Quote:
fury kills the 980ti in this game at 1080pOriginally Posted by PureBlackFire
the Fury is a great value. it really matches the 980ti at 4k.
http://www.nordichardware.se/Grafikkort-Recensioner/the-division-beta-vi-prestandatester-arets-mest-efterlaengtade-spel/Prestandatester.html#content
Comparing pre-release GPU-Z images to current ones and calling the most relevant image wrong.Originally Posted by DrFPS
I dont know WHAT Hexus is smoking there is NO way these number are correct.
Sure would like to give the benefit of the doubt, instead of saying Hexus boosted the numbers to make the product review more appealing.
There is no way this GPU is making 512 GB/s of bandwidth. Especially when all the other R9 Furys are making 256 GB/s. Now look at the pixel fill, 67.2 Gb/s. WHAT, no way. When all the other r9 are making 134.4 Gb/s with out overclocking. Come on.
And if it's that messed up just on the gpuz. You know I get it, there may be some kinda of problem with gpuz. However the reviewer just copy and pasted w/o even looking at the results. The rest of the review can straight in the toilet. As the reviewer not even smart enough to see how erroneous these numbers are. What a joke. They must think we are dumb?
Is this a joke? The Fury is a terrible value, it often gets outpaced by an overclocked 980. Comparing it to 980 Ti is about the most senseless thing I've ever seen done on the internet.Originally Posted by PureBlackFire
the Fury is a great value. it really matches the 980ti at 4k.
And kept a few others. Literally, what use is Battlefield 3 when Battlefield 4 has launched except to skew the results? They should adopt the geometric mean if they wish to mediate the results of such widely ranging tests.Originally Posted by BiG StroOnZ
Most widely used and accepted as accurate.
They even removed Project Cars from their testing suite entirely, because of how much it ended up skewing results.
Testing methodology is perfectly fine, it is the most used source on this forum. Please stop with this belligerent nonsense.Originally Posted by Tojara
They're not. Running many tests doesn't help when your testing methodology is crap.
They frequently update the testing suite with new popular games, Battlefield 4 and 3 are still popular, the reasoning behind keeping them. Almost every single review site still uses Battlefield 4. If you think TechPowerUp is unreliable then, what do you think of Guru3D?Originally Posted by mtcn77
And kept a few others. Literally, what use is Battlefield 3 when Battlefield 4 has launched except to skew the results. They should adopt the geometric mean if they wish to mediate the results of such widely ranging tests.
I'm not the one vouching for them. Maybe, you should explain.Originally Posted by BiG StroOnZ
They frequently update the testing suite with new popular games, Battlefield 4 and 3 are still popular, the reasoning behind keeping them. Almost every single review site still uses Battlefield 4. If you think TechPowerUp is unreliable then, what do you think of Guru3D?
