Woundman
Just upgraded to this and it seems like they added a new backward/forward button functionality. According to the release notes, the forward button is automatically hidden if there are no pages in forward history. To fix this, I just added a separator between the right button and the address bar (right click empty area -> customize). Just thought I'd post this just in case some of you guys weren't liking the new hidden forward button.
Quote:
Not all synthetic tests are relevant to real world apps.
Check your fps in Chrome vs Firefox on this: http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Performance/FishBowl/Originally Posted by scriz
FWIW:
Chrome 16:
![chrome.png]( "chrome.png")
Firefox 10:
![ff10.png]( "ff10.png")
Not all synthetic tests are relevant to real world apps.
Quote:
Firefox is at 60 until 2000 fish, then its around 54~.Originally Posted by PoopaScoopa
Check your fps in Chrome vs Firefox on this: http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Performance/FishBowl/
Not all synthetic tests are relevant to real world apps.
Quote:
Chrome 16 gets just over a million for me.Originally Posted by scriz
FWIW:
Chrome 16:
![chrome.png]( "chrome.png")
Firefox 10:
![ff10.png]( "ff10.png")
Quote:
for me its 60fps even at 2k fish and I get 753174 points on that other test.(FF10)Originally Posted by Celeras
Firefox is at 60 until 2000 fish, then its around 54~.
Quote:
![smile.gif]( "smile.gif")
Try chrome and see how much fps you getOriginally Posted by gooface
for me its 60fps even at 2k fish and I get 753174 points on that other test.(FF10)
Why are you guys running a fish benchmark when the forum you're posting on is sufficient? Just kidding...
![tongue.gif]( "tongue.gif")
Quote:
lol..you're kidding right?Originally Posted by jrbroad77
Everyone knows Firefox is better. Chrome is the hipster that jumped on the browser bandwagon late.
Soooo why do these browser benchmarks matter again? All I care about is stability, not 2000 fish fps. I play games outside of my browser.
Quote:
Yeah, speed means nothing when you can't notice a difference without a benchmark. They are all sufficient in speed. The only reasons to even post or worry about those is to try to justify why you use one or another, or to try to sway someone else into using the one you do. Both are pointless. Use the one that has the UI and features/add-ons you like and be done with it. Most of those tests are heavily CPU dependent, so comparing one person's to another is pointless anyway. For reference, I got almost 750K on FF12a in the browser mark. Would I get more in Chrome? Probably. Would I notice any difference at all in every day things? 99% sure I wouldn't. I use FF because it has the things I like and I love the customization. For those who like to mess around with every little thing, FF is a must for a browser.Originally Posted by Doomtomb
Soooo why do these browser benchmarks matter again? All I care about is stability, not 2000 fish fps. I play games outside of my browser.
The benchmark was just a "for what its worth"..as stated by the "FWIW." Not meant to sway anyone either way. I could care less which browser anyone uses..I for one use Netscape Navigator 1.0.
![thumb.gif]( "thumb.gif")
for fishbowl:
FF10: 2k fish= 60FPS
chrome 18.0.1017.2: 2k fish= ~42FPS
browsermark:
FF10: 777k
chrome: 1,118,8830
personally FF10 seems more responsive than chrome for me tbh.
FF10: 2k fish= 60FPS
chrome 18.0.1017.2: 2k fish= ~42FPS
browsermark:
FF10: 777k
chrome: 1,118,8830
personally FF10 seems more responsive than chrome for me tbh.
Unless there is a program that can port Firefox extensions. Firefox will always win in my book xD
Quote:
http://build.chromium.org/f/chromium/snapshots/Originally Posted by Domino
Where do you guys get chromium 18?
Quote:
About:flags shows its enable. Even with 10 fish I'm getting 17 fps.Originally Posted by GreenArchon
You most likely have gpu acceleration disabled.
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
