I've been using wine, but it's never quite been the same as gaming in windows. I can't wait to get my paws on this!
Full Article.
Quote:
Full Article.
Quote:
Who else is stoked?
Who else is stoked?Valve's growing Linux team is already experiencing success in optimizing the Source Engine, and in particular their initial Left 4 Dead 2 game, for Linux. In fact, the native Linux build with the Source OpenGL renderer is faster than running the game on Windows 7 with DirectX!
Who else is stoked?Valve's growing Linux team is already experiencing success in optimizing the Source Engine, and in particular their initial Left 4 Dead 2 game, for Linux. In fact, the native Linux build with the Source OpenGL renderer is faster than running the game on Windows 7 with DirectX!
So not much of a difference. I would also like to see heavier work loads of well. The difference between 270 and 282 FPS may seem significant but you notice no difference in the real world, but under heavy work loads, if the difference is only a couple frames, dealing with a more user friendly developer API doesn't seem half bad for a couple frame difference.
That's not a lot considering most of our systems average 300FPS with Source.
Why wait? Start compiling your own kernel from source! The code exists my friend. Valve is working hand in hand with AMD, NVIDIA, and Intel on not just better drivers, but open source ones too!
GabeN himself said he is going to start lobbying and pressuring distributors on his platform to make the switch.
Lol that's ok your choice. I will probably never get rid of windows, there is always something that I need it for (Currently just games and Ableton Live). If I got all my games ported to Linux, then i could do seamless windows 7 to integrate Ableton into the linux desktop. Damn that'd be sexy.
Its not a lot, but almost any computer can run linux in some shape or form. And, as such, this might be a percentage difference enough for older computers running linux to be able to run the game at playable settings or not. Nonetheless, I see what you mean, and what I said above is purely hypothetical, however, the fact that they were able to get opengl to play so well is a score for fans of linux who'd rather not revert to windows for gaming.Originally Posted by Domino
So not much of a difference. I would also like to see heavier work loads of well. The difference between 270 and 282 FPS may seem significant but you notice no difference in the real world, but under heavy work loads, if the difference is only a couple frames, dealing with a more user friendly developer API doesn't seem half bad for a couple frame difference.
But Valve doesnt have OpenGL l4d2 support publicly availble for windows. Which forces you to use DX9. That means that there is a total of 45FPS difference. The difference between buttery smooth and a still picture.Originally Posted by dude120
Its not a lot, but almost any computer can run linux in some shape or form. And, as such, this might be a percentage difference enough for older computers running linux to be able to run the game at playable settings or not. Nonetheless, I see what you mean, and what I said above is purely hypothetical, however, the fact that they were able to get opengl to play so well is a score for fans of linux who'd rather not revert to windows for gaming.