Quote:
Source
As if I already didn't have to worry about black holes, now I have to worry about black holes with speeding stars circling around them.
SourceUCLA astronomers report the discovery of a remarkable star that orbits the enormous black hole at the center of our Milky Way galaxy in a blistering 11-and-a-half years - the shortest known orbit of any star near this black hole.
The star, known as S0-102, may help astronomers discover whether Albert Einstein was right in his fundamental prediction of how black holes warp space and time.
SourceUCLA astronomers report the discovery of a remarkable star that orbits the enormous black hole at the center of our Milky Way galaxy in a blistering 11-and-a-half years - the shortest known orbit of any star near this black hole.
The star, known as S0-102, may help astronomers discover whether Albert Einstein was right in his fundamental prediction of how black holes warp space and time.
Statistically, you are safe.Originally Posted by damric
Quote:
SourceUCLA astronomers report the discovery of a remarkable star that orbits the enormous black hole at the center of our Milky Way galaxy in a blistering 11-and-a-half years - the shortest known orbit of any star near this black hole.
The star, known as S0-102, may help astronomers discover whether Albert Einstein was right in his fundamental prediction of how black holes warp space and time.
As if I already didn't have to worry about black holes, now I have to worry about black holes with speeding stars circling around them.
Really, the star might be a plus. Might give you an early warning that you're approaching a black hole.
more like a minus, despite what i said in an earlier post(even if it was possible) ..would it really be a good idea to see certain death? since there would be no way to push out solar system out of it, let alone have enough energy to do it
Yes, except when you get close enough to a black hole the escape velocity is higher than the speed of light which theoretically isn't possible to do if you have mass. Unless if you have an infinite amount of energy which again theoretically isn't possible lol.
Absolutely, unless you've crossed the event horizon, at which point there is no speed you can travel to escape the pull.
so it is possible to escape if you are far enough..thats good to know..anyone else up for turning our solar system into a giant space station?
I think it is in fact. Very. They will be using this star along with the 2nd closest star to test Einsteins general relativity theory near a black hole. I find that very exciting.Originally Posted by lordikon
Absolutely, unless you've crossed the event horizon, at which point there is no speed you can travel to escape the pull.
This news isn't super exciting, there are plenty of stars orbiting the black hole at the center of the galaxy, this one is just the closest found so far.
No, since mass = energy, infinite energy would mean infinite mass. There's a finite amount of energy in the universe that is either contained in mass or constantly being converted.
i meant like..its kinda hard to say this..let say we have a motor..part of that energy goes to the motor spinning, part of it to heat and part of it to sound..doesnt that mean the energy is just converted?Originally Posted by crust_cheese
No, since mass = energy, infinite energy would mean infinite mass. There's a finite amount of energy in the universe that is either contained in mass or constantly being converted.
Also, not to worry, it'll be hella long time before we'll have to worry about black holes.
Accelerate enough to escape an object that eats light? 9001m^2/s
It is converted, but that doesn't make it infinite. Given a finite amount of mass it can be converted to an amount of energy equal to it, which would also be finite.Originally Posted by AznDud333
Quote:
i meant like..its kinda hard to say this..let say we have a motor..part of that energy goes to the motor spinning, part of it to heat and part of it to sound..doesnt that mean the energy is just converted?Originally Posted by crust_cheese
No, since mass = energy, infinite energy would mean infinite mass. There's a finite amount of energy in the universe that is either contained in mass or constantly being converted.
Also, not to worry, it'll be hella long time before we'll have to worry about black holes.
what if we can convert that energy back! anyway i get your point about infinity..since DeltaE=F*D and F=m*a, and since we cant get to the speed of light we will hit a brick wall right?
Think of it like two glasses, one full of water, one full of air. You can pour water from one into the other and back. Now, you can also change the water to air, or air to water. So you could have two glasses of air, or two glasses of water, or anything in between. Now, to escape the black hole you need infinite number of glasses of water, and you have two. You cannot simply create extra glasses of water out of nothing.Originally Posted by AznDud333
Quote:
what if we can convert that energy back! anyway i get your point about infinity..since DeltaE=F*D and F=m*a, and since we cant get to the speed of light we will hit a brick wall right?
Only once you cross the event horizon, for which you would have to be basically "touching" it (super close to the center). .
The gravitational effects would become apparent a long ways off, for a black hole of any significant mass.
Chances are that if a significant black hole passed through our area, we would not just fall into it with out warning.
Correct.
Yes, you are right energy doesn't get used up, but the amount of energy needed to go over the speed of light if you have mass is (theoretically) all the energy in the universe and then some more.
Statistically, you are 50% likely to be a test subject living within a simulation.
I think that the point is that due to relativity the star could be rotating faster around the black hole than Newtonian physics would say. If this is really the case then this is good proof that relativity is indeed a valid theory.