Overclock.net banner

[WashingtonPost] California bar bans Google Glass, fears recording

7.2K views 181 replies 56 participants last post by  Pixelmancer  
#1 ·
(SOURCE)


Quote:
Trista Bernasconi, co-owner of The Willows, told KCBS she doesn't want her customers worrying about the device, which has recording capabilities among other functions.
Is anyone here on OCN a bit weary of everyone having a camera on their face ready to record? At least in phones the camera isn't always out and ready. This bar isn't the first to ban it - there have been a few stories of restaurants and such banning Glass. I wonder if mass legislation will appear to ban glass in all private businesses, or something.
 
#3 ·
I would say it's likely some sort of legislation might be passed to clarify / reinforce definitions around this type of device as the product reaches the mass market. Bars and restaurants and shopping malls aren't public places, they are private places where you are allowed in, many of them already state that you can't take pictures, and those that don't assume it's not an everyday occurrence exactly because of what you said, because people tend to notice if you're pointing a camera or a smartphone at someone / something.

With Google Glass you never know when it's recording, so it's akin to create an uncomfortable environment for the people surrounding it. Especially because you can actually be recording video, instead of just the occasional photo as people mostly do with a smartphone.
 
#4 ·
Why is recording any different than watching in a bar. I mean sure in like a movie theater or a comedy club that is ok. But in my opinion cell phones are worse. In high school guys would use their cell phones going up the stairs to take pictures etc, you get the idea. At least with glass you can see what they are recording.
 
#5 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiftstealth View Post

Why is recording any different than watching in a bar. I mean sure in like a movie theater or a comedy club that is ok. But in my opinion cell phones are worse. In high school guys would use their cell phones going up the stairs to take pictures etc, you get the idea. At least with glass you can see what they are recording.
How is it different than watching? Is that a serious question?
 
#6 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by y2kcamaross View Post

How is it different than watching? Is that a serious question?
Business and the government record everything, yet we aren't allowed. The only difference is you can replay it again. Which i can already do with my memories.
 
#7 ·
Meh. This whole thing is absolutely stupid. Trying to fight or "ban" Glass is only going to encourage someone to make a new alternative that is incredibly sleek and stealthy, to the point that you can't even tell it's a smart device.
 
  • Rep+
Reactions: Samoflange
#8 ·
Private users tend to tweet and facebook their videos and photos.
 
#9 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiftstealth View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by y2kcamaross View Post

How is it different than watching? Is that a serious question?
Business and the government record everything, yet we aren't allowed. The only difference is you can replay it again. Which i can already do with my memories.
that's cool, but if someone happens to be at a bar drunk, you replaying it in"your memory"is irrelevant, you uploading it onto YouTube,etc, where everyone in the world can see, including co workers, your boss,etc is a different story imo
 
#10 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by y2kcamaross View Post

that's cool, but if someone happens to be at a bar drunk, you replaying it in"your memory"is irrelevant, you uploading it onto YouTube,etc, where everyone in the world can see, including co workers, your boss,etc is a different story imo
Then don't drink in a public place if you don't want your private life to be known.
 
#11 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiftstealth View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by y2kcamaross View Post

that's cool, but if someone happens to be at a bar drunk, you replaying it in"your memory"is irrelevant, you uploading it onto YouTube,etc, where everyone in the world can see, including co workers, your boss,etc is a different story imo
Then don't drink in a public place if you don't want your private life to be known.
There are laws specifically to protect people from this sort of thing. If a bar decided to ban a device from being used in their establishment, it is the owners RIGHT to do so. If you invited a man into your house, and he decided to start smoking, you have the right to ask him to put it out or leave. Sure, it isn't illegal to smoke inside of a private establishment, but the owner can decide that it is unwelcome if he chooses.

9/10, would drink at this bar
 
#12 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiftstealth View Post

Then don't drink in a public place if you don't want your private life to be known.
are you for real?

doh.gif


so... your in a bar (fyi im old enough to be able to drink in them so have experience) and its quite a large bar / pub, your saying everyone in that bar has a right to hear your conversation even if its between two closed people sat at a table.. not only that but broadcast to the entire world

your literally insane if you think that's ok
kookoo.gif
 
#13 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiftstealth View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by y2kcamaross View Post

that's cool, but if someone happens to be at a bar drunk, you replaying it in"your memory"is irrelevant, you uploading it onto YouTube,etc, where everyone in the world can see, including co workers, your boss,etc is a different story imo
Then don't drink in a public place if you don't want your private life to be known.
A bar isn't a public place, even shopping malls that sometimes look like streets with a glass ceiling aren't public places.

Public places are streets and beaches and the like.

Also, while the shopping mall has security cameras, there are strict provisions on what can be done with those and who can access them and penalties for the staff that infringes on the rules. Just because both the governments and private companies sometimes have people in them that don't comply with the law and do the exact opposite, doesn't mean that the law is wrong.
 
#14 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by tpi2007 View Post

A bar isn't a public place, even shopping malls that sometimes look like streets with a glass ceiling aren't public places.

Public places are streets and beaches and the like.

Also, while the shopping mall has security cameras, there are strict provisions on what can be done with those and who can access them and penalties for the staff that infringes on the rules. Just because both the governments and private companies sometimes have people in them that don't comply with the law and do the exact opposite, doesn't mean that the law is wrong.
I think there's different interpretations of public. "public place" as in legally if its public or private, and "public place" as in how private are your conversations and actions. A mall based on the second interpretation is not public (at least in the main areas of the mall)
 
#15 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by felon View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by tpi2007 View Post

A bar isn't a public place, even shopping malls that sometimes look like streets with a glass ceiling aren't public places.

Public places are streets and beaches and the like.

Also, while the shopping mall has security cameras, there are strict provisions on what can be done with those and who can access them and penalties for the staff that infringes on the rules. Just because both the governments and private companies sometimes have people in them that don't comply with the law and do the exact opposite, doesn't mean that the law is wrong.
I think there's different interpretations of public. "public place" as in legally if its public or private, and "public place" as in how private are your conversations and actions. A mall based on the second interpretation is not public private (at least in the main areas of the mall)
I think that is what you mean (small edit in the quote above).

Yes, true, but still, there is an innate right to a sphere of privacy, even in public places. For example, it's not acceptable for you and a friend to be walking on the street, talking to each other, and someone deliberately walking 30cm behind you two with a microphone and a camera pointed at your faces.
 
#18 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by tpi2007 View Post

Yes, true, but still, there is an innate right to a sphere of privacy, even in public places. For example, it's not acceptable for you and a friend to be walking on the street, talking to each other, and someone deliberately walking 30cm behind you two with a microphone and a camera pointed at your faces.
somebody who gets it
thumb.gif
 
#20 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by tpi2007 View Post

I think that is what you mean (small edit in the quote above).

Yes, true, but still, there is an innate right to a sphere of privacy, even in public places. For example, it's not acceptable for you and a friend to be walking on the street, talking to each other, and someone deliberately walking 30cm behind you two with a microphone and a camera pointed at your faces.
I think this is semi relevant to the topic http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/05/us/massachusetts-upskirt-photography/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

Might not be appropriate though...
 
#22 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by phill1978 View Post

are you for real?

doh.gif


so... your in a bar (fyi im old enough to be able to drink in them so have experience) and its quite a large bar / pub, your saying everyone in that bar has a right to hear your conversation even if its between two closed people sat at a table.. not only that but broadcast to the entire world

your literally insane if you think that's ok
kookoo.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bridden View Post

There are laws specifically to protect people from this sort of thing. If a bar decided to ban a device from being used in their establishment, it is the owners RIGHT to do so. If you invited a man into your house, and he decided to start smoking, you have the right to ask him to put it out or leave. Sure, it isn't illegal to smoke inside of a private establishment, but the owner can decide that it is unwelcome if he chooses.

9/10, would drink at this bar
While i understand these arguments you have to understand how some people would use the product. Having lost my dad a month ago having some records would hold an immense amount more value to me. Example last feburary my brother announced his wife was pregnant and we were all out to dinner at an olive garden. If i had a google glass there, sitting at our table recording it would hold an immense amount of value, and i wouldn't have been recording anyone else on purpose. If i even had someone else's voice on the recording i wouldn't care.

All of your thoughts are malicious. You think people will be using it to spy on people on purpose. Sure some people will use it maliciously, just like people drive aggressively. Things are misused its pretty much a fact of life. I don't see how this misuse is any different than the misuse, and should be treated differently. I mean if someone is recording you i'm sure you would be able to tell. In a bar that loud you'd have to be very close to hear anything, And if you do something embarrassing it's equally embarrassing if you do it in public regardless. A google glass doesn't have enough space on it to walk around, and record just to catch funny moments. It would need to have meaning to record as it doesn't have space for 24/7 recording.
 
#23 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiftstealth View Post

While i understand these arguments you have to understand how some people would use the product. Having lost my dad a month ago having some records would hold an immense amount more value to me. Example last feburary my brother announced his wife was pregnant and we were all out to dinner at an olive garden. If i had a google glass there, sitting at our table recording it would hold an immense amount of value, and i wouldn't have been recording anyone else on purpose. If i even had someone else's voice on the recording i wouldn't care.

All of your thoughts are malicious. You think people will be using it to spy on people on purpose. Sure some people will use it maliciously, just like people drive aggressively. Things are misused its pretty much a fact of life. I don't see how this misuse is any different than the misuse, and should be treated differently. I mean if someone is recording you i'm sure you would be able to tell. In a bar that loud you'd have to be very close to hear anything, And if you do something embarrassing it's equally embarrassing if you do it in public regardless. A google glass doesn't have enough space on it to walk around, and record just to catch funny moments. It would need to have meaning to record as it doesn't have space for 24/7 recording.
and MANY will use it innocently passively and capture the next scandal as much as they capture a personal moment, conversation or land someone in deep crap at work etc..

btw sry for your loss. Personally i dont like having video footage of loved ones, id just sit there replaying it and depressing myself. Im happy with my own fond (perhaps too glossy and kind) memories.
 
#24 ·
What is the feasibility of establishments implementing technology similar to this to blind/jam cameras en masse?
 
#25 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by phill1978 View Post

and MANY will use it innocently passively and capture the next scandal as much as they capture a personal moment, conversation or land someone in deep crap at work etc..

btw sry for your loss. Personally i dont like having video footage of loved ones, id just sit there replaying it and depressing myself. Im happy with my own fond (perhaps too glossy and kind) memories.
Just because something isn't captured on camera doesn't make it any less of a scandal. You are seriously paranoid and might want to go grab a tin foil hat.

And if someone that records it knows you well enough to know where you work you might want to re evaluate your friends.