Overclock.net banner
21 - 40 of 83 Posts
Actually had 2 of 64gb in raid0 mode. Decided to return em though do to no trim in raid mode and firmware support from Micro Center seeming unrealistic.
 
Discussion starter · #24 ·
^^Well, that was silly. The new SF controllers do allow garbage collection in Raid 0, which does something VERY similiar to TRIM. And the Firmware is going to be updated through ADATA, at least according to my local MC techie.
 
Discussion starter · #26 ·
Quote:


Originally Posted by dlee7283
View Post

is this better than the Vertex?

what is the best between these three

X25,Vertex,Sandforce

I wish anadtech would add one to their bench so I could compare.
 
I'm having issues installing Win 7 in the Microcenter 128gb ssd :-\\ keeps becoming unstable and crashing and corrupting. Just pulled it out of the box and plug and installed. Looked at the description in the MC website and says OS supported are XP, Vista, think that is the issue?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dlee7283 View Post
is this better than the Vertex?

what is the best between these three

X25,Vertex,Sandforce

Quote:

Originally Posted by hondajt View Post
I wish anadtech would add one to their bench so I could compare.
Well this is just wrong. Sandforce is a controller used in Vertex drives. So that's a little misleading. In other words, you can compile an entire list of drives that use sandforce controllers and are more or less the same.

Mushkin Callisto Deluxe
OCZ Vertex 2/Agility 2 (subtle differences here though)
Inferno
etc.
 
So how come there isn't more hype around these MC SSD's? I feel like they should be going like hot cakes.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeaceMaker;11646052
So how come there isn't more hype around these MC SSD's? I feel like they should be going like hot cakes.
They are I think. I mean the comparable sized SSDs are all around the same price, with the Micro Center one (made by A-DATA) has 4GB more space.
 
Quote:


Originally Posted by Cavi
View Post

They are I think. I mean the comparable sized SSDs are all around the same price, with the Micro Center one (made by A-DATA) has 4GB more space.


Quote:


Originally Posted by Cavi
View Post

That's no different from any other HDD/SDD though...

ding ding ding... INCORRECT

They have marketed it by saying how much NAND Flash it contains, not the usable space, like most other SSD products, it's exactly the same as other Sandforce products, with 60GB (55.9GiB) usable.

My guess is it's a re-branded A-Data which is where I first saw this weird "incorrect" labeling.

In GiB (Binary Gigabytes or "Gibibytes") (1,073,741,824 bytes)
Amount of NAND Flash: 64 GiB
Amount of "spare area": 8.08 GiB
Amount of usable space: 55.92 GiB

In GB (Decimal Gigabytes) (1,000,000,000 bytes)
Amount of NAND Flash: 68.7 GB
Amount of "spare area": 8.7 GB
Amount of usable space: 60 GB

So you can see AData (and Micro Center) have advertised the NAND Flash amount in GiB, while most manufacturers are advertising the usable space in GB

Confusing still is that some SSDs (C300 and some Indilinx) have less spare area and so have 64 GB (59.6 GiB) of usable space, but all of the ~60GB drives have 64GiB of actual NAND.
Image


Oops forgot to mention the worst part, Windows displays amounts of data in Gibibytes, but labels them with GB, causing no end of confusing amongst HDD buyers... "Why is my 1000 GB drive 931 GiB"
 
All these are is a sf-1200 in a different box, no need to say they suck because they are micro-center brand.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by finalturismo;11650631
All these are is a sf-1200 in a different box, no need to say they suck because they are micro-center brand.
Trying to find the post you're referring to? Who said they suck?
confused.gif
 
I know they're from A-Data, someone confirmed that in another thread. They just sold out yesterday at my local microcenter... hmm, i feel like i should just wait for something more promising after xmas.
 
21 - 40 of 83 Posts