Download Here!
Download Here!
they are still way off. That video is 16x sped up. The FPS is 0.33 it's unplayable. Give it at least 2 more years till they find a way to emulate it way faster.Originally Posted by MapRef41N93W
What are the recommended/required specs? I assume this emulator will actually need processors with lots of logical cores unlike say Dolphin which just wants two really fast cores?
Understatement of the thread right here, ladies and mostly gentlemen!Originally Posted by Germanian
nice job. Trying to emulate those PS3 cores must be some crazy task.
PS3 is single-core with hyperthreading (well, not technically, but it's the same thing in practice). It also has six FPU "cores" used like a GPGPU; that's what makes Cell Cell. I'd assume you could use two cores to emulate the main core, but I'm not sure of the others. It would be neat if tasks for those could be offloaded to integrated graphics or the GPU, since CPUs are awful at floating-point. An 18-core Haswell-EP chip is going to be less powerful than an A10-7850k using HSA, for example, in floating-point.Originally Posted by MapRef41N93W
What are the recommended/required specs? I assume this emulator will actually need processors with lots of logical cores unlike say Dolphin which just wants two really fast cores?
Quote:Originally Posted by Germanian
they are still way off. That video is 16x sped up. The FPS is 0.33 it's unplayable. Give it at least 2 more years till they find a way to emulate it way faster.
OK thanks for the answers.Originally Posted by CynicalUnicorn
Understatement of the thread right here, ladies and mostly gentlemen!Yeah, I'm sure it will be a programming nightmare to implement those well, or perhaps at all.![wink.gif]( "wink.gif")
PS3 is single-core with hyperthreading (well, not technically, but it's the same thing in practice). It also has six FPU "cores" used like a GPGPU; that's what makes Cell Cell. I'd assume you could use two cores to emulate the main core, but I'm not sure of the others. It would be neat if tasks for those could be offloaded to integrated graphics or the GPU, since CPUs are awful at floating-point. An 18-core Haswell-EP chip is going to be less powerful than an A10-7850k using HSA, for example, in floating-point.
weeks ago it was running doom, now it's running a retail game. 2-3 years top and you'll play it decentlyOriginally Posted by junkerde
give it 10 years and hardware will be okay enough to emulate it
also where are the commercial games? I could care less for this homebrew stuff really. cmon now.
I remember folks saying that two or three months ago. It's pretty impressive that they have progressed this well in such a short amount of time.Originally Posted by farmdve
I remember some folks used to say it was impossible to emulate PS3, guess they were wrong.
I believe that the 1.6GHz Jaguar cores are roughly equal in power to two Haswell cores at twice the speed, meaning an i3. Given the number of threads available, an FX-6000 or an i5 is likely going to be the minimum to run them well.Originally Posted by Buris
Wouldn't it be easier to emulate the PS4 and XBONE?
x86 cores and all, an i7 or FX 8000 series should be able to emulate with each core using 1/2 or less CPU power.
That'll be next year, I'd bet.
Wait clarify this, you mean the 8 Jaguar cores inside the consoles are equal to two 3.2GHz Haswell cores correct? The way I'm reading that it sounds like you mean core for core.Originally Posted by CynicalUnicorn
I believe that the 1.6GHz Jaguar cores are roughly equal in power to two Haswell cores at twice the speed, meaning an i3. Given the number of threads available, an FX-6000 or an i5 is likely going to be the minimum to run them well.
But yes, that's more like decryption than emulation and much easier in theory. It's a stock-standard x86 CPU using a stock-standard GCN GPU running modified Windows and Linux kernels.
core-for-core, check it out.Originally Posted by MapRef41N93W
Wait clarify this, you mean the 8 Jaguar cores inside the consoles are equal to two 3.2GHz Haswell cores correct? The way I'm reading that it sounds like you mean core for core.
