Overclock.net banner
121 - 140 of 251 Posts
DA 3.5g sensor sure had an issue with random parts of the mousepad. The logo in the center was fine though.

The 3310 can have issues with illustrations depending on how it's implemented by the mouse. The KPM works properly. My FM 2015 and someone's ZA11 kept thinking they were lifting off.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by wareya View Post

DA 3.5g sensor sure had an issue with random parts of the mousepad. The logo in the center was fine though.

The 3310 can have issues with illustrations depending on how it's implemented by the mouse. The KPM works properly. My FM 2015 and someone's ZA11 kept thinking they were lifting off.
Ah didn't know that, I knew the 3090's had some issues with colored pads/pads with designs, but didn't think the 3310 would have any issues at all.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by wareya View Post

DA 3.5g sensor sure had an issue with random parts of the mousepad. The logo in the center was fine though.

The 3310 can have issues with illustrations depending on how it's implemented by the mouse. The KPM works properly. My FM 2015 and someone's ZA11 kept thinking they were lifting off.
My DA 3.5G had zero problems on this pad, I have the blue version.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorruptBE View Post

There's dirt and there's your wrist slowly but surely creating a cavity
tongue.gif
I thought dirt, dust, etc. doesn't really stick to the Zowie G-SR surface as bad as it does to the SteelSeries QcK Heavy? I just ordered my Zowie G-SR, would an electric duster help prevent the dust/dirt spots where I lay my wrist?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by agsz View Post

Anyone else disappointed with the quality upon opening it? The sides/corners show signs of fraying already
mad.gif
No worries, looks like you're in luck: $
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximillion View Post

No worries, looks like you're in luck: $
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sencha View Post

I wonder what they've purposely left off that mat so they can add it back in in six weeks time. trollface.jpg
Currently RMA'ing my Zowie EC1-A, which has a chipped sensor trim lens. I filed for this RMA late September as well. I asked for the new revision since I have 4 friends all with Zowie EC1-A/EC2-A's with chipped sensor trim lens's, and figured the newly revised one most likely won't have that issue, and they finally fixed the mousewheel issue. This is their response 5 days later: "Hi Anthony,
The revisions were not made to address or fix anything regarding its predecessors. Therefore, your replacement would not be the recently announced BenQ/ZOWIE GEAR revision of our mice line.
Best Regards, ZOWIE GEAR - Customer Care"
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sencha View Post

Wow that's so lame. As a show of good faith giving you the latest revision would cost them next to nothing but go a long way with the customer.
Yeah I know, and they can't even claim I'm RMA'ing strictly to receive the new revision, since they only announced that at latest a week ago. The fact that they don't even acknowledge their buggy mousewheel is ridiculous. I'm pretty sure that tons of people have the defective sensor/sensor trim lens like I do, but aren't as meticulous as I am.

And to think I just gave them another $40 for the Zowie G-SR
kookoo.gif
lachen.gif
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sencha View Post

Wow that's so lame. As a show of good faith giving you the latest revision would cost them next to nothing but go a long way with the customer.
I had something along those lines happen to me, I asked if they would RMA my P-TF Speed because the X series came out literally 3 days after I bought the P-TF Speed and they claimed they had no replacing process for returning products for brand new products, oh well I guess, I didn't like the Zowie mouse I got and I'll probably never buy another Zowie product.
 
121 - 140 of 251 Posts