Overclock.net banner
1 - 20 of 43 Posts

Computurd

· Registered
Joined
·
612 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 · (Edited)
Intel's CEO Brian Krzanich resigned today for fooling around with the staff.

Shortly after news of Krzanich's resignation broke, Intel released a statement acknowledging the news. Intel says an investigation by internal and external counsel confirmed a violation of the company's non-fraternization policy. Krzanich, who is married, resigned voluntarily, though it is clear that he would have been ousted regardless.
"The board believes strongly in Intel's strategy and we are confident in Bob Swan's ability to lead the company as we conduct a robust search for our next CEO. Bob has been instrumental to the development and execution of Intel's strategy, and we know the company will continue to smoothly execute. We appreciate Brian's many contributions to Intel," said Intel Chairman Andy Bryant.


https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-ceo-resign-brian-krzanich,37339.html
 
He should resign after Iris graphics driver.

Not to mention he admited that 7nm is better than their 10nm, he called Coherent Fabric "glue", and FreeBSD ended support of hyper thrading. More to come? They also were trying to fire all PR team, and demoed 28core CPU cooled by something bigger than entire rig. No fab advantage? No Intel.

edit: Oh sorry he also mentioned Intel will do it's best to not let AMD get more then 20% server market. I mean who cares for no competition?
 
Agreed with the above comments.
The reason begin relationship related is just a cover for the actual reason...
Its performance based. If a CEO was making a company tons of cash, they would happily agree to pay off any "relationship" problems.
Brian had become complacent. Not enough pressure was being placed into R&D (even though the money was) and now Intel, who were undeniably the only high performance enterprise Chip maker, now have huge competition in several spaces due to complacency over the last decade or more. You have not only AMD now competing head to head, but also Intel were far too slow to attempt to compete against Qualcomm and now Samsung are also making Chips.

This is 95% performance related and the relationship is the excuse for it.
 
Agreed with the above comments.
The reason begin relationship related is just a cover for the actual reason...
I was about to say the same thing. They're just using it as an excuse, so it doesn't look like Intel is in trouble, and they're trying to change up the leadership.

There are probably tons of managers there that have had relationships with other employees.

I was always hoping Intel's slow improvements the past 7 years were temporary while they worked on something major behind the scenes, but it never came. I can't believe they thought they could keep up the tiny incremental improvements forever.
 
The 'consensual' part is suspect, but i'm more interested in this little bit. Does Intel know something we dont? From what i've read, the company is in good standing financially with Krzanich when he resigned.


Intel's Brian Krzanich had been under scrutiny after he sold $39 million of his own Intel stock, leaving him with the Intel-mandated minimum of 250,000 shares, before the company notified the public or the industry of the Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities. Those vulnerabilities led to several class-action lawsuits. As reported by Bloomberg, that could have exposed Krzanich to an SEC investigation for insider trading. In fact, just hours before his CES keynote, Block & Leviton LLP, announced it was investigating Krzanich for securities fraud.
 
Cheated or not, I expect the reason to use it as an excuse is so their stock won't take a bigger hit than they expect it to get, and maybe stop the downfall of their stock with a promise of a new future.
I guess regardless, he is expected to take a bit hit financially from both the trade investigation and family issues soon enough.

I don't personally blame him for the silly things people here post like drivers, the bugs which predated him, or claims as if he personally put a huge cooler and OCed the 28 core.
I do think that intel hadn't had a good vision since sandy bridge or ivy bridge, and they have been basically been walking forward like the world is at their feet, milking the same technology without any improvements (though I would blame AMD as well for not giving them a fight).
Lets see whether a new CEO will kick them back into work to improve things, or just fire more people to make more money to shareholders.
 
This is big news and may very well be true, but with all the things happening at Intel right now one has to question, especially after the Spectre / Meltdown fallout, the CEO's investigation for having sold most of his shares last year before the news was out, the 10nm problems, and, just last week, him admitting that AMD's EPYC would gain marketshare and implicitly admitting that Intel wouldn't be able to prevent AMD from getting at least up to 15% marketshare, perhaps more.

This is of course not the best way to leave the company, but resigning for bad performance would be much worse for both him and the company Wall Street wise, so one has to wonder.
 
Buh-BYE! You will not be missed, Brian.
 
He should have resigned after Spectre/Meltdown.
You are absolutely correct. This guy was so focused that he couldn't keep his willy in his pants with female employees. Intel is on the march to doom and failure. It is reactive not proactive.
 
1 - 20 of 43 Posts