Source: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition Review - Disruptive Price-Performance
Looks like Jacket Man was telling the truth. It matches the 2080Ti.
Source: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition Review - Disruptive Price-PerformanceNVIDIA's GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition retails at $499, which is a highly competitive price. Remember, RTX 3070 matches RTX 2080 Ti, which retailed for $1200+ just a few months ago. As of today, around this price point there's not a lot of alternatives—GeForce RTX 3070 owns the performance segment. Nobody's going to buy any Turing cards now, unless they come with a huge discount. I could see how a used RTX 2080 Ti around $400 would let me overlook its higher power/heat/noise vs the $500 RTX 3070 FE. Unless you absolutely can't find an extra $120, there's no reason to buy a AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT either. RTX 3080 is a reasonable upgrade, if you want more FPS and are willing to spend another $200+, and can find one in stock. Let's hope there is more RTX 3070 supply than RTX 3080, because RTX 3070 is going to fly off the shelves, no doubt. AMD announces their Radeon RX 6900 Series tomorrow, it will be interesting to see whether they'll be able to compete with NVIDIA this generation.
Source: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition Review - Disruptive Price-PerformanceNVIDIA's GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition retails at $499, which is a highly competitive price. Remember, RTX 3070 matches RTX 2080 Ti, which retailed for $1200+ just a few months ago. As of today, around this price point there's not a lot of alternatives—GeForce RTX 3070 owns the performance segment. Nobody's going to buy any Turing cards now, unless they come with a huge discount. I could see how a used RTX 2080 Ti around $400 would let me overlook its higher power/heat/noise vs the $500 RTX 3070 FE. Unless you absolutely can't find an extra $120, there's no reason to buy a AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT either. RTX 3080 is a reasonable upgrade, if you want more FPS and are willing to spend another $200+, and can find one in stock. Let's hope there is more RTX 3070 supply than RTX 3080, because RTX 3070 is going to fly off the shelves, no doubt. AMD announces their Radeon RX 6900 Series tomorrow, it will be interesting to see whether they'll be able to compete with NVIDIA this generation.
At 4K, I have to agree. But at 1440p/1080, this card seems like a real winner. Even with "just" 8GB.From techspot since TPU isn't actually using the highest texture settings which hae been well reported as an issue for 8gb cards...
SNIP
Not buying an 8gb card in 2020, sorry.
16gb Ti version will be the real winner here, even at $599.
Depends on the game.Buying a $500 GPU and expecting to push a high-end resolution doesn't really add up, imo. The 3070 is not aimed at 4K; this is a 1080P/1440P card.
So being that it has near identical performance to the prior $1200 card which was pushed as the only 4k option now the 3070 isn't a 4k card? It's perfectly capable, just gimped by the low Vram when we are about to hit 2021. Yea, some titles it will get by, but with the new gen hitting and games only getting more vram hungry it's not $500 well spent IMO.Buying a $500 GPU and expecting to push a high-end resolution doesn't really add up, imo. The 3070 is not aimed at 4K; this is a 1080P/1440P card.
At 1080p, sure I could justify it. But personally not 1440p or higher. Then again, I've been tainted by being on a 4k monitor for about 6 years now so Vram has always been a priority for me.At 4K, I have to agree. But at 1440p/1080, this card seems like a real winner. Even with "just" 8GB.
Soooooooooo were you not around before the 10-series, or...?Buying a $500 GPU and expecting to push a high-end resolution doesn't really add up, imo. The 3070 is not aimed at 4K; this is a 1080P/1440P card.
The Fermi comparisons just keep lining up.So being that it has near identical performance to the prior $1200 card which was pushed as the only 4k option now the 3070 isn't a 4k card? It's perfectly capable, just gimped by the low Vram when we are about to hit 2021. Yea, some titles it will get by, but with the new gen hitting and games only getting more vram hungry it's not $500 well spent IMO.
At 1080p, sure I could justify it. But personally not 1440p or higher. Then again, I've been tainted by being on a 4k monitor for about 6 years now so Vram has always been a priority for me.
You do realize the Xbox series x and ps5 exist right?Buying a $500 GPU and expecting to push a high-end resolution doesn't really add up, imo. The 3070 is not aimed at 4K; this is a 1080P/1440P card.
Yea, I'm really hoping that reoccurs. I missed out on that gen of pc hardware as I was still rocking an Athlon 64 X2 4200+, 2gb DDR400 and a AGP x1950 pro back then (oof but money was tight).The Fermi comparisons just keep lining up.
EDIT: Would be funny if Big Navi pulled an HD5000.
I'm not sure future gen games will require as much as you think.Yea, some titles it will get by, but with the new gen hitting and games only getting more vram hungry it's not $500 well spent IMO.
True, but they will miss out on the superior RT and DLSS performance.And the real winners are those who acted quickly and bought 2080 Ti's for 500 bucks from the panicked sellers. They basically got a 3070 with 11 GB VRAM and more overclocking headroom.
Fair enough, however, DLSS and RT losses are not that big of a deal anyway. Not yet, at least.True, but they will miss out on the superior RT and DLSS performance.
On the other hand, they will have a card now. Who knows with current stocks...
What? Leather Jacket Man said it beat the 2080 Ti. Not matched or was slower. Oh well guess we can call that similar to a "Jensen 2X" with the 3080.Looks like Jacket Man was telling the truth. It matches the 2080Ti.