Overclock.net banner

Overclocking "Raptor Lake refresh" - 14900k,14700k, 14600k etc results, bins and discussion

17 reading
2.3M views 24K replies 595 participants last post by  suzuki  
#1 ·
Just in case :p
 
#2 · (Edited)
Testing 14 series bin:


Falkentyne said:
Easy way to test this.
Start at 5.7 ghz. 1.32v Bios set, LLC6. 4.4 E cores (dont do 4.5 e cores, low ecore SP will mess this up too much), 4.8 ring. Load hwinfo64 sensors and go to WHEA at bottom
Try to pass 10 loops of Cinebench R23 without error (this is good enough).

If you pass, lower voltage 10mv (1.32v-->1.31v) and test again. Keep going until you get a CPU Cache L0 error, Internal Parity Error or application error, then raise vcore 10mv higher, test that 1 more time, if you pass, record this in a forum message (Bios voltage set + LLC6).

If you fail initially, set voltage up 10mv (1.32v-->1.33v set, LLC6), run R23 10 loops, keep going higher 10mv until you pass then record the pass voltage.

--------------------------------

Then.......
Go to 5.8 ghz. This will require good cooling.
Start at 1.370v bios set + LLC6, 4.5 (not 4.4) E cores. 4.8 cache.
Try to do 10 loops of R23 without WHEA error or crash. Same sequence (up or down depending on initial pass or failure). Post the pass bios set voltage and LLC.

**If you are delidded do not do this test (except for your own purposes) because delid test is going to be too hard to compare to normies, not useful for comparing V/F points and silicon quality.

--------------------------------------
Stuff:
Intel APO
Make sure the Dynamic Tuning is enabled in Asus bios.

I have been able to install intel apo following these steps but it does not work.

View attachment 2632361


View attachment 2632360

ASUS MemTweakIt 20230628 Ver.
Tweak Tools / 2023-Aug-18 / By bianbao
support next gen cpu.

_MemTweakIt_2023-06-28.zip

Memory tweak:


Code:
DqVrefUP DqVrefDOWN
150 7000 68
154 7200 72
158 7400 76
162 7600 80
....
170 8000 88
178 8400 96
186 8800 104
198 9400 116
---------
For TRFC/RFCpb
448/364 <probably best case scenario for H16A @ ~8000
480/390
512/416
544/442
576/468
608/494 <probably best case scenario for H24M @ ~8000
640/520
672/546
704/572
736/598
768/624

---
net user administrator /active:yes
The ADMIN account Win 11
 
#4 ·
#5 ·
Depending on how you count it, you'd either be second (second member posting in thread) or third (third post). :p
Thanks for keeping this place decent!

I don’t count @Nizzen. Obligatory opener of the threads!
 
#6 ·
Forth member posting in thread, sixth post :p The 14900K will be a cooler 13900KS..
 
#7 ·
I expect Nizzen to post some DDR5 9000 numbers when he gets the 14900K, with some BF2042 gameplay of course. Season 6 will be out by the time 14900K is here :geek:
 
  • Rep+
Reactions: Nizzen
#8 ·
...DDR5 9000 numbers...
At least DDR5 9001 numbers, please. So we can crack "it's over 9000!" jokes. :p

...I'll get my coat...
 
#11 ·
14900k or wait for ks 🤔
 
  • Rep+
Reactions: CarSalesman
#12 ·
#14 ·
14900k it is then, ks fingers crossed 🤞
 
#15 ·
Fingers crossed then we get 14900KS specs with a 14900K before they bin them out.
 
#16 ·
If the memory controller is way better than average 13900k/ks, then 14900k may be a good choice. 100mhz more on "KS" doesn't matter much if you look at gaming performance. Memory performance is still meta for high fps gaming on Intel.

need to test everything syndrome
🤓🤙
 
#17 ·
If the memory controller is way better than average 13900k/ks, then 14900k may be a good choice. 100mhz more on "KS" doesn't matter much if you look at gaming performance. Memory performance is still meta for high fps gaming on Intel.

need to test everything syndrome
🤓🤙
Looks like a 400MHz bump on 14th gen IMC with native memory support for DDR5-6000 vs DDR5-5600 IMC on 13th gen. Intel Core i9-14900K vs Intel Core i9-13900K Benchmark, comparison and differences
 
#18 ·
  • Rep+
Reactions: Braegnok and Nizzen