Overclock.net banner
41 - 60 of 75 Posts
I have not yet managed to set my adaptive vcore.
I9 10900K & Asus z490 strix gaming e

4.9ghz all core
SVID Behavior "Best Case Scenario"
LLC 4
IA AC LL 0.01
vcore adaptive 1.32v

My goal is to get about 1.2v load (it was I need to pass stress test)
But this only get me about 1.14v in load, is there a way to fix this?

Thanks alot guys
Try SVID= trained

Go to vf point you run full load and adjust.
 
Discussion starter · #43 ·
I have not yet managed to set my adaptive vcore.
I9 10900K & Asus z490 strix gaming e

4.9ghz all core
SVID Behavior "Best Case Scenario"
LLC 4
IA AC LL 0.01
vcore adaptive 1.32v

My goal is to get about 1.2v load (it was I need to pass stress test)
But this only get me about 1.14v in load, is there a way to fix this?

Thanks alot guys
This looks to me that you didn't follow all of the steps of the guide to find the IA AC LL value which will get your 1.2v load voltage. Also, it you are looking at a 4.9 OC it'll be easier if you do not use the V/F curve point, you'll only need to find the proper IA AC LL value.
 
  • Rep+
Reactions: robalm
This looks to me that you didn't follow all of the steps of the guide to find the IA AC LL value which will get your 1.2v load voltage. Also, it you are looking at a 4.9 OC it'll be easier if you do not use the V/F curve point, you'll only need to find the proper IA AC LL value.
Ye im sorry i have read it a few times now but i still don't understand :confused:
So i can use this settings bellow, and just change the IA AC LL from 0.01 to 0.02 and work my way up?
4.9ghz all core
SVID Behavior "Best Case Scenario"
LLC 4
vcore adaptive 1.32v
 
Ye im sorry i have read it a few times now but i still don't understand :confused:
So i can use this settings bellow, and just change the IA AC LL from 0.01 to 0.02 and work my way up?
4.9ghz all core
SVID Behavior "Best Case Scenario"
LLC 4
vcore adaptive 1.32v
The board ignores your adaptive target because your target frequency (4.9ghz) is less than or equal to your single core boost (5.3ghz). Adaptive target voltage only works on a 10900k if your target frequency is 5.4ghz or higher. You can increase the load voltage at 4.9ghz by bumping IA A/C to 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, ... etc. while leaving vcore at adaptive mode "auto" or auto.
 
The board ignores your adaptive target because your target frequency (4.9ghz) is less than or equal to your single core boost (5.3ghz). Adaptive target voltage only works on a 10900k if your target frequency is 5.4ghz or higher. You can increase the load voltage at 4.9ghz by bumping IA A/C to 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, ... etc. while leaving vcore at adaptive mode "auto" or auto.
Thank you.
From what i can tell by reading the first post "SVID Behavior. Its “Best Case Scenario” setting sets IA AC LL to 0.01"
I should not use SVID Behavior Best Case Scenario then?

It should look something like this?
4.9ghz all core
SVID Behavior "auto"
LLC 4
IA AC LL 0.xx
vcore adaptive "auto"
 
Yup you got it. Just vary the IA AC LL from 0.01 to 0.60 (? ) while keeping the rest constant. I'm unsure about where you should stop as I'm not sure how LLC4 is configured for your board.
Just keep an eye on vcore at stock voltage settings with a constant 4.9ghz and use that as the voltage ceiling for your undervolt. E.g. if it tops out at 1.20v under prime95 v30.3b6 smallFFTs AVX, find the IA AC LL that would give roughly the same load voltage for LLC4 and use that as the ceiling for your undervolt.
When overclocking past 49x, you'll typically need higher IAACLL as voltage scaling becomes really bad at higher clock speeds.
 
Yup you got it. Just vary the IA AC LL from 0.01 to 0.60 (? ) while keeping the rest constant. I'm unsure about where you should stop as I'm not sure how LLC4 is configured for your board.
Just keep an eye on vcore at stock voltage settings with a constant 4.9ghz and use that as the voltage ceiling for your undervolt. E.g. if it tops out at 1.20v under prime95 v30.3b6 smallFFTs AVX, find the IA AC LL that would give roughly the same load voltage for LLC4 and use that as the ceiling for your undervolt.
When overclocking past 49x, you'll typically need higher IAACLL as voltage scaling becomes really bad at higher clock speeds.
Thanks alot.
I have succeeded quite well in some stress tests but it oscillates too much
Aida64 stress fpu = 1.199v
Realbech = drops to = 1.161v
Aida64 stress cpu / cache / fpu = 1.21v
cpuz stress test = 1.172v

Aida64 stress fpu is perfect and also Aida64 stress cpu / cache / fpu 1.21v is ok.
But realbech is too low vcore.
Do not know how to fix this?

Settings:
4.9ghz all core
LLC 4
IA AC LL 0.10
vcore adaptive auto
 
Thanks alot.
I have succeeded quite well in some stress tests but it oscillates too much
Aida64 stress fpu = 1.199v
Realbech = drops to = 1.161v
Aida64 stress cpu / cache / fpu = 1.21v
cpuz stress test = 1.172v

Aida64 stress fpu is perfect and also Aida64 stress cpu / cache / fpu 1.21v is ok.
But realbech is too low vcore.
Do not know how to fix this?

Settings:
4.9ghz all core
LLC 4
IA AC LL 0.10
vcore adaptive auto
The only stability that matters is your hardest stress test. That's the voltage you want to stabilize.
 
But aida64 is the hardest when it come to power it use 1.199v that will pass the test.
Realbech use less power and i get 1.161v and that will fail the test, it needs 1.2v.
Who cares if you're stable in aida64 when you fail once your voltage drops. Always tailor your voltage to match your workload. I guess if you're only using your pc to browse the internet and game then nothing to worry about...

OCCT, prime95, and Linpack Xtreme will all pull more current than aida64. In fact, they will pull laughably more lol

I'd suggest OCCT AVX if you don't have temp issues or prime95 (no avx/avx 2). How long you want to run them really is up to you, just keep an eye out for WHEA or cache errors.
 
Who cares if you're stable in aida64 when you fail once your voltage drops. Always tailor your voltage to match your workload. I guess if you're only using your pc to browse the internet and game then nothing to worry about...

OCCT, prime95, and Linpack Xtreme will all pull more current than aida64. In fact, they will pull laughably more lol

I'd suggest OCCT AVX if you don't have temp issues or prime95 (no avx/avx 2). How long you want to run them really is up to you, just keep an eye out for WHEA or cache errors.
I think you missunderstad me. He say use the "hardest stress test" the hardest test aida64 use perfect vcore. Aida64 fpu use almost the same power as prime95 small no avx.
I never run prime95 with avx.

Yes Aida64 stress cpu / cache / fpu is very light.
But if you run only Aida64 fpu it is not "laughably"
 
I think you missunderstad me. He say use the "hardest stress test" the hardest test aida64 use perfect vcore. Aida64 fpu use almost the same power as prime95 small no avx.
I never run prime95 with avx.

Yes Aida64 stress cpu / cache / fpu is very light.
But if you run only Aida64 fpu it is not "laughably"
Yep, you definitely missed my point but good luck. Every user requires different levels of stability based on their typical workload. If Aida works for you, great...
 
Necro sub: Since we have some gurus here & this thread has some fantastic info I think will help alot of people.

I am coming from Kaby Lake so SVID behavior aka AC/DC LL is completely new to me (aside from the basic Kaby Lake reccomendation of setting ac/dc LL to .01mohm & leaving it there).
With the help of this thread & a couple others through googleinterwebs (this info is somewhat reclusive) I have a little better grasp on starting this 11900K adaptive OC.

So I wanted to start off with an Asus AI OC (SP 82 cooling 192) to see what it would do before I went down the 11900k adaptive OC rabbit hole. I ran it & then hit the "stop training" button to do some testing. I noticed that Best-case scenario set AC/DC LL to .01mohm which was unstable for me at LLC level 4. Typical-Scenario (the next less optimistic setting) however seems stable although it sets it to a whopping .600mohm so I set out to find a stable value using P95 NO AVX & came up w/ .200mohm tentatively.
I noticed something strange although not sure if its abnormal so I have a couple questions. My load voltages seem fine but I noticed that when I open 3dMark from steam my vcore max reading in HWinfo64 showed a high reading of 1.634v (thats when ac/dc LL was set to .370mohm). I was able to get that max voltage reading down to 1.598v - 1.607v by changing my AC/DC LL value to .200mohm as mentioned above. NOTE: These high max voltages are NOT sustained, its just a split second spike caused by opening 3dmark. Idle voltages range from .700v- 1.45+ish v.

Font Line Screenshot Software Technology


Rectangle Font Screenshot Parallel Software

1. Should I be concerned about these very infrequent but high spikes & Is there a way to stop them from happening? (Im hoping they wont happen when I set my adaptive overclock). Ive tried setting a voltage ceiling in the bios using Max auto voltage of 1.5v or so but it is just ignored for some reason. Remember this is just a (meh) AI OC for testing & curiosity, I intend on doing a final proper adaptive overclock later once I understand these new knobs a little better.

2. Should I run some P95 AVX/AVX2/AVX512 stability tests? I have NOT set an avx offset & have NOT yet decided if my final adaptive OC will have one (depends on if my custom loop can handle the temps I guess once I set my All Core &/or Per Core OC's).

3. What does "Trained" SVID Behaviour do exactly & when should it be used? (I noticed trained sets the DC LL to a diff. value than the AC LL & I know that DC LL has something to do with cpu package power). I noticed at least one person in this thread is using a diff. value for their AC vs DC LL values.

4. My V/F point 8 5300mhz offset in bios reads 1.468v. Is it true that when I set my adaptive OC I can NOT use any value lower than this voltage & if I do it will just be ignored? I assume that when I do my adaptive OC I will need to use a + offset for 53x, 54x, etc.
I have been trying to find a good video explaining how to use the V/F point offset settings to OC as this is a new feature to me as well.

5. System Agent LLC also a new knob for me. I was using the max setting (Level 3) because it allowed me to run system agent much lower & the load SA voltage was much closer to what I set in the bios. I recently changed it back to "Auto" which is actually Level 1, however with Auto I had to set SA voltage to 1.380v in bios (for stability, kept getting dual boots on restarts) rather than 1.347v which is what it was set to with Level 3.
Is there any drawbacks or any reason I should NOT use the max setting for SA LLC? Im not sure if it has any detrimental effect or influence on any other settings. It also didnt seem to have any effect on vcore.


Other Info:
Asus M13Hero / Intel i9-11900k / G skill 32gb 3600mhz ram @ 3733mhz 16 17 17 36 1.380
Currently Using my PC for browsing the web, playing games, running benchmarks, photos, music etc.
 
Discussion starter · #58 · (Edited)
That voltage spike is very curious and something of concern. Looks to me that there's an enabled bios feature overriding the V/F curve's control of the VID, given the info you state. As for what this feature is I can't say for sure; perhaps you have the voltage mode set to Manual and the voltage value set to Auto (which pretty much defeats the usefulness of Manual mode). I found that attempting to use any of the Asus AI overclocking features leads to problems, and overall it seems to me that you missed or misunderstand some of the key points of the guide. Beyond saying this, I really can't help you.
 
  • Rep+
Reactions: RobertoSampaio
Sorry for the late reply. Nope Have never had the voltage mode set to manual on this motherboard, not yet any way. I do agree however it does appear to have something to do with the AI overclocking feature cause it doesnt seem to happen when doing an adaptive OC. Im just not sure why the vcore auto voltage cap is not working. Oh well so much for experimenting with the AI oc feature Im done with that.
Now if I could just figure out why the event viewer shows 1 WHEA error at startup every time I boot. Every thing is otherwise satble, seems to be there even removing the overclocks
 
41 - 60 of 75 Posts