Overclock.net banner

3DMark Storage Benchmark

1.7K views 11 replies 5 participants last post by  GRABibus  
#1 · (Edited)

???

So, i ran it again.


I guess a $3 benchmark is worth about $3.
 
#2 ·
Niether test was complete. Look at the details. I haven't had issue with it myself. My Optane 900p pegs that benchmark.
 
#3 ·
Not sure what you mean, all tests have a result?
 
#6 ·
Created support ticket with Futuremark.

Wonder what their explanation will be...
 
#7 ·
Benches are about as consistent as I'd expect from a modern consumer NAND SSD and the access times look spot on. Bandwidth could be higher than the mean for a variety of reasons.

I don't think the software is the issue. Probably UL's filter not accounting for legitamate variables in drive performance.
 
#8 ·
UL replied, saying it appears there is RAM caching software installed, but I have no such software.
 
#9 ·
No samsung magician installed?
 
#11 · (Edited)
So, if the benchmark requires certain criteria to give 'valid' or 'acceptable' results, that should be stated up front.

Also, it is advertised as a "test for measuring the gaming performance of SSDs and other storage hardware", but while I have three SSD connected, it only tests the Windows (C) drive, and does not offer to test anything else. I run my games from external drives, not my Windows drive, so how is that testing my 'gaming performance'?

Waste of three bucks.

EDIT:

I apparently missed that it does offer to test all drives, there is a drop down on the benchmark start page, so I stand corrected.
 
This post has been deleted
#12 ·