Overclock.net banner
61 - 69 of 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by metal571 View Post

What's so bad about the QcK? Everyone I know who has had one has had it last literally forever. Sure it eventually deteriorates after a couple years but cleaning it usually restores most of the original glide. You can't say the 9HD is fundamentally better though, a lot of us lower sensitivity gamers, myself included, prefer more friction, not less, so we can stop more precisely rather than float around on a pad with too much glide, not to mention that the 9HD was optimized specifically for the 9500 and 9800 and some modern opticals can sometimes have more issues rather than less issues when tracking on it.
well, you said clearly something interesting, lower sensi players prefer more friction while mid/high love faster glide
i can use cloth pad but with lower friction, ARTISAN does make such cloth pads, its also thicker i belive and tends to have most likely more premium looking than qck
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajx View Post

well, you said clearly something interesting, lower sensi players prefer more friction while mid/high love faster glide
i can use cloth pad but with lower friction, ARTISAN does make such cloth pads, its also thicker i think and tend have most likely more premium looking than qck
The only reason I use a Talent is that it is slow (mine is pretty worn) and gigantic. Artisan just seems like a waste of $$ from some of my friends who have those pads, lol
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DivineDark View Post

I own 20 mouse pads... I can name 4 that have the same or lower friction. Razer Scarab, RatzPadz, Zowie Swift, and fUnc F30.
Hey Divine / anyone - I have a RatzPad, I play csgo with an MX518 for now (not sure which mouse to upgrade to). Would you say I should look into a qck+ instead of the RatzPad, to gain a bit of friction?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeddemore View Post

Hey Divine / anyone - I have a RatzPad, I play csgo with an MX518 for now (not sure which mouse to upgrade to). Would you say I should look into a qck+ instead of the RatzPad, to gain a bit of friction?
I own a RatPadz too and play CSGO. It was fantastic, but I gave mine up because there wasn't enough room to swipe. Switched to a Puretrak Talent. CSGO players typically have lower sensitivity settings than other competitive shooters so I think you may benefit from a larger pad. Whether qck+ is the best option for you depends on your aim style. It's not a hard and fast rule, but I notice that higher sensitivity players and wrist aimers like lower friction hard pads/fast cloth pads (Many more Quake Live players use hard pads than CSGO), and low sens players who aim more from the arm like higher friction cloth pads.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oh wow Secret Cow View Post

I own a RatPadz too and play CSGO. It was fantastic, but I gave mine up because there wasn't enough room to swipe. Switched to a Puretrak Talent. CSGO players typically have lower sensitivity settings than other competitive shooters so I think you may benefit from a larger pad. Whether qck+ is the best option for you depends on your aim style. It's not a hard and fast rule, but I notice that higher sensitivity players and wrist aimers like lower friction hard pads/fast cloth pads (Many more Quake Live players use hard pads than CSGO), and low sens players who aim more from the arm like higher friction cloth pads.
I find this to be the general consensus. Cloth for low sens and hard mats for higher sens.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by woox View Post

How important is thickness for a cloth mouse mat? Does a thicker mouse mat effect gaming than a thinner one?
You feel and hear more of your table with a thin pad. You'll notice it most when you're putting down your mouse at the end of a swipe -- there is more abrasive feedback since the pad is not cushioning the impact. Basically thin pads feel and sound closer to "clunk" and thick pads closer to "thump"

There is no difference performance wise.
 
61 - 69 of 69 Posts