Such unimpressive gaming performance.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by UltraMega

Such unimpressive gaming performance.

Were you expecting the performance delta to be commensurate with the price premium?

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by UltraMega

Such unimpressive gaming performance.

It's not a gaming card.

 

I just more disappointed with the price (three times more expansive??), it should be still around $1000-$1500 like traditional prices for Titan series.

 

82mhz hash rate not bad, but thn again its a 3k card haha

 

Best GeE Pea You for gaming? 1080Ti.

 

I really wonder if some e-peen guy bought this for his gaming rig.

Also, only basic mining with Claymore ETH. Like, for real, there are 5-6 more options to test, like ZEC,XMR, which are all different algo's.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Owari

It's not a gaming card.

It is, just like any other geforce card.

 

"well worth it"

-boutique lovers of OCN

 

LOL who runs a 7820 stock with 2666 ram? no wonder scores are low across the board. if your gonna test the card in gaming then set your PC up to "game". no ones buying this 3k card to pair with slow ram and stock cpu settings. should change name of site to "stock hardware" not hot.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jbravo33

LOL who runs a 7820 stock with 2666 ram? no wonder scores are low across the board. if your gonna test the card in gaming then set your PC up to "game". no ones buying this 3k card to pair with slow ram and stock cpu settings. should change name of site to "stock hardware" not hot.

At 4k 2666mhz isn't exactly the worry...

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Owari

It's not a gaming card.

It is not a gaming card, but it should still have the gaming performance of the 1180 Ti or Titan Xv.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by ToTheSun!

Were you expecting the performance delta to be commensurate with the price premium?

I was expecting a generational leap; 30-40% over the 1080 Ti across the board.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anateus

It is, just like any other geforce card.

It's got a bunch of tensor cores useless for gaming and lower base and boost frequency on the cuda cores it does have. Its good if you normalize for performance per clock speed poer watt.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyrotagonist

Quote:

Originally Posted by ToTheSun!

Were you expecting the performance delta to be commensurate with the price premium?

I was expecting a generational leap; 30-40% over the 1080 Ti across the board.

Considering games cannot utilize the extra double precision performance (of which the V has stupid amounts in excess over the 1080ti), I don't see how you'd expect that.

It's a much more performant card, but only slightly in gaming.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyrotagonist

Quote:

Originally Posted by Owari

It's not a gaming card.

It is not a gaming card, but it should still have the gaming performance of the 1180 Ti or Titan Xv.

Considering it's under the Geforce brand, one has to assume it IS a gaming card, but with some extra juice for other tasks. Or the other way around, depending on the perspective.

 

Does it not have Gaming drivers? or does it only have professional drivers...

It's whatever you buy it for , or want it to be, with YOUR money. Not defending the price but some of you are quite Polarized.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by kd5151

Best GeE Pea You for gaming? 1080Ti.

Not to be picky here, but that's a false statement.

The best Gea Pea You for gaming is this new TitanV, assuming "best" refers to fastest.
Obviously you meant price/performance, in which case the 1080Ti still isn't the best. But i understand what you're saying

 

I was reading the PC Per review and was surprised that on some compute benchmarks it does no better than the Titan Xp; I'm guessing that it's a driver optimization problem.

I was also surprised that AMD does better with Vega with FP16. I thought that the Tensor cores could help out in that department, but apparently not quite. Or it's a driver problem.

The double precision (FP64) results though are through the roof.

 

Benchmarks results may be seem crappy. But it is NOT even a GeForce card. Also, unlike previous Titan cards that card didn't even introduce as a gaming card. So, criticising its price just funny because this card made for AI Researchers and scientists. GV100 chip has been developed for the deep-learning market so its main architecture has been designed via those factors.

Volta is an architecture which is completely based on deep-learning market and its derivatives. Therefore, those Ampere architecture rumors for the GeForce segment make really sense for me.

 

I don't think these gaming benchmarks are disappointing at all. This is a professional card based on a new architecture and likely does not have too many game-specific optimizations for its architecture in the drivers. You also have to remember that professional cards are always healthily underclocked relative to their consumer equivalents for stability and reliability. This card at 1080 Ti boost clocks and 2GHz HBM2 would be no joke at all, not that it is as it stands.

 

there is zero geforce branding on this card. They actually removed the geforce logo from this titan.

 

Now lets see the shunt mod and some overclocking done.
Surely this card is heavly limited by power limit because the number of cores.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmgjet

Now lets see the shunt mod and some overclocking done.
Surely this card is heavly limited by power limit because the number of cores.

Yes. Based off of the testing on my V, there is 10-20% performance left on the table.

 

I'm a bit lost in whats this is for. When Amd came out with semi work cards ppl screamed that drivers and support were crucial and gaming performance mattered. Now Nvidia does basically the same thing and driver support doesn't really matter and gaming doesn't matter. I just don't get the flip flop nature of the whole thing dependent on branding. Seems mostly pettiness rules the roost.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Asisvenia

Benchmarks results may be seem crappy. But it is NOT even a GeForce card.

Are you sure?