Overclock.net banner

Ryzen 3600 4.2 ghz all core @ 1.29375V can you do better?

1 reading
133K views 287 replies 80 participants last post by  Hale59  
#1 · (Edited)
Havent seen many posts showing the underdog, aka R3600 non x, here is my current stable overclock on all cores:
3600 4.2ghz all core OC using ryzenmaster 2.01.1233
Cpu voltage: 1.29375V
Core clock: 4200 mhz
Cinebench R20 multi core: 3656
Cinebench R20 single core: 464
Max cpu temp: 68 deg C
Idle temps: 37 deg C

Motherboard: MSI x570 pro carbon wifi
Cpu: ryzen 3600

I was able to get through 3 runs on cinebench at
4250 all core OC @1.3625V
4275 all core OC @1.375

However i didnt like the higher voltages, and the v droop that followed


If you have a higher all core OC on a R 3600, post your results below.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Image
 
#2 ·
darn, I need 1.293758675309v on mine.
 
  • Rep+
Reactions: Veii and Dhoulmagus
#5 ·
Try this one,it has Ryzen Master but mine is 3600X so it does not count.Oh just to let you know .Ryzen Master is not accurate as you may think but it is better than some.



Image
Still good to see what can be done, looks like the x is worth the extra $50, if you are able to to get a stable 4.3ghz on 1.031volts


Can you get a higher OC if you bump the voltage?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 
#8 ·
I prefer just setting at 1.297v for 4.2GHz

PBO wasn't worth the annoying voltage boosting and fans spinning up on my R5 3600

Core 0 4200
Core 1 4225
Core 2 4250
Core 3 4250
Core 4 4250
Core 5 4225
 

Attachments

#21 ·
Exactly ,why the hell would i play at 720/1080 with RTX 2080.In the real world ,I am informing people of testing I completed. Instead of misleading people saying buy faster Ram when you do not need to.Use what you have.I am not going to argue with you about this,so say your peace.People have a right to be informed ,no mater what your opinion may be about testing on low resolution gaming .I am one of the nutbars that know what the truth is and the test are for people that do not need to waste money looking for something that can not be fixed with some reading and testing yourself.
 
#22 · (Edited)
But not everybody is playing @ 1440p ultra and if you wanna show the impact of RAM, than you have to show that in a CPU limited scenario and the next point is, we dont know your subtimings, because those can have a huge impact too.
In your test we see that faster RAM is providing better lows and if you play @ 1080p 144Hz it will have an impact when you play with fast and optimized RAM (including optimized subtimings).
And with fast RAM you can downclock and undervolt your CPU (very strong UV) and you still will have good FPS, look at my video here:
This is 1080p Ultra Settings: 3.4GHz with fast RAM is faster than 4.2GHz and 3200CL16 RAM.
Power Consumption is up to 200% higher on the 4.2GHz Setting and it is slower!



You know what i mean? Tuning your RAM will provide you with a enormus uplift in performance and it will cost you much much less Power compared to overclocking your CPU (or leaving it @ stock).
With RAM Tuning you can compensate your Performance loss when downclocking and undervolting and as you have seen it is faster while consuming much less power.
 
#32 · (Edited)
This is 1080p Ultra Settings: 3.4GHz with fast RAM is faster than 4.2GHz and 3200CL16 RAM.
Power Consumption is up to 200% higher on the 4.2GHz Setting and it is slower!
That's pretty impressive. +rep

edit:

So based of these results, would you be able to work out an optimal balance of frequency and timings to suit 4.2GHz? Or would the RAM frequency required be higher than currently possible?
Or have you basically found the highest possible ram frequency and lowest timings and tuned the processor to suit?



So i oc my 3600 to 4.150 all core 1.29 but im concern about HW info show no frequency decrease instead Ryzen Master show correctly slowing frequency and parking core on idle, its only mine bugged ? same CPU Z stuck to 4150 mhz.
FOrgot to say im on RYzen Balance plan but its the same whit windows balance plan
Does voltage decrease, or do both the frequency and voltage stay static at all times?
 
#27 ·
Mine is having issues to get to 4.2 on auto also ........ Max 4.1.

However, on 42x runs just fine. Specs: https://valid.x86.fr/mjazw6

A little bit limited on cooling right now, but should be fine, as I need more silence than raw power. I also have to tackle the memory as it runs on xmp default.

Overall, I'm very happy with the system!
 

Attachments

#31 ·
So i oc my 3600 to 4.150 all core 1.29 but im concern about HW info show no frequency decrease instead Ryzen Master show correctly slowing frequency and parking core on idle, its only mine bugged ? same CPU Z stuck to 4150 mhz.
FOrgot to say im on RYzen Balance plan but its the same whit windows balance plan
 
#36 ·
3700x 4.3 all core 1.35v

Cinebench 20 multi 4989 (not done single yet)
 
#37 ·
3700x 4.3 all core 1.35v



Cinebench 20 multi 4989 (not done single yet)
U did notice that this is about 3600, right?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk
 
#39 · (Edited)
I own a Ryzen 3600 and I'm currently using the stock cooler, my current overclock is 4050mz @ 2.19V. Gets up to about 86c w/ prime95. (I honestly didn't think I would get past 3.9ghz with the stock cooler!)

https://valid.x86.fr/dic6dz
 
#41 ·
Its 4.3ghz @ 1.3v not 1.35 on the 3700x

I am surprised the 3700x is going higher on lower volts. I expected the 6 core to hit higher frequencies on lower temp/volts compared to the 8 core.
 
#58 ·
I dont think chipset matters as my 3700x does 4.3 @ 1.3v on MSI X470 Gaming Plus
 
#59 ·
Well, from what I've seen online, it looks like the the same CPU will behave differently on X370 / X470 motherboards. At the beginning, I got my R5 3600 into my old X370. It was working like a charm, but that particular board (MSI X370 Krait Gaming) feeds the Ryzen 5 3600 insane amount of voltage (1.486V)!!! And I've done my research, was thinking about going for a cheap X470, but I realized that in order to be 100% I have to go for X570. And it was the right choice. Yes, you can be lucky and get 4.3 OC @ 1.3V, but you cannot be sure that if you pair the same CPU with another X470 board will get the same result.
 
#70 ·
No problem ;)
 

Attachments

#71 ·
@cssorkinman

Wrong CPU lol

:p

Man what are the temperatures in your home ?
 
#72 ·
Heh, about 70 F. Vishera temps don't read accurately at all until about 35 C and at that voltage /speed with a 240mm clc it doesn't get that warm even while stressing.

I was just curious if it could do it and was a bit surprised it could - the FX 9370 is the most power hungry cpu I own. At default settings on the CHVZ It will send 1.58 volts to the cpu when turboing.
 
#77 ·
Have any of you confirmed stability with prime95? I was able to get 4.25ghz at 1.35v “stable” with every stress teadt I threw at it... until I tried prime95. I can’t get any manual settings stable whatsoever when testing with prime95, so I just bumped up the PBO to 4.4ghz limit with uncapped power restrictions. I get around 4.25-4.3ghz stable in prime95 at 50-60 degrees when I let PBO do it’s thing. (Up until the extreme power test which brings temps up to 85c and frequency down to 4ghz).
 
#78 ·
I got 3,705 with peak 1.25vcore @ 4.175 GHz oc.
Peak thermal during the run was 67c and my idle is 32c.

See the attached photo for the run results and the oc settings I used in Ryzen Master.
 

Attachments