This line needs a 95W product so badly. Make a Ryzen 5 2600G with 4 cores 8 threads that clocks up to 4Ghz on turbo and increase GPU core count to 1024, then I'm sold.
Why the hell they limit themselves to 65W when their platform is 95W capable is beyond me... Perhaps AMD really likes the term "underdelivering company" and wants it stuck with them.
Another thing about memory bandwidth:
It's quite clear that these GPUs severely bottlenecked by memory bandwidth as DDR4 3200Mhz at 64bit is barely enough. Yet Ryzen's IMC still can't handle anything faster than 3200. Keep in mind AMD, if you are going to make an APU, next time make sure your IMC design is top notch and can handle speeds above 3200Mhz. I know Intel also officially supports very low speed ram but it's a breeze to run 4266Mhz ram with 8700K.
There are kits out there that clocks up to 4700Mhz... sure that's extreme, you don't have to go that much, at least let some of us go up to 4000 by overclocking to remove that bottleneck... I have never seen any Ryzen chip that can run any ram speed above 3600mhz and even that's very rare and happens with cherry picked samples.
Amd = late & weak.