http://overclocking.guide/the-truth-about-cpu-soldering/Originally Posted by Dopamin3
Good guy AMD not ripping off enthusiasts. I'm so fed up with Intel and their lack of innovation over the years sitting fat, comfortable and greedy. I wish Ryzen was out at the time I built my PC so I didn't have to go with the 4790K. Next build will be AMD for sure...
Like for real, since Intel did start using crappy thermal paste between core and IHS, couldn't they have still used solder on the K series CPUs??? Would it add $2 to the manufacturing costs? They're already price gouging i7s at $350 (thankfully the price is dropped but they still can't compete with Ryzen lol)
At least I'm not the only one. I guess cutting away from myself is too ingrained in me but I had to skip forward a bit there.
Quote:Originally Posted by Lays
http://overclocking.guide/the-truth-about-cpu-soldering/
TLDR, the die on new K series and process size are too small, thus the heat from soldering can't be dissipated quick enough and can damage die / damage things over-time from thermal shock.
That article is hardly conclusive. Figure 9 in it is highly distorted. Intel could use a more pliable glue than bends to accommodate the shrinkage. Intel could also use a thicker substrate to prevent too much warping.
Well, there's also this scholarly article about it:
Intel now can't compete even if drop price of i7-6900K on 500$.Originally Posted by Dopamin3
Good guy AMD not ripping off enthusiasts. I'm so fed up with Intel and their lack of innovation over the years sitting fat, comfortable and greedy. I wish Ryzen was out at the time I built my PC so I didn't have to go with the 4790K. Next build will be AMD for sure...
Like for real, since Intel did start using crappy thermal paste between core and IHS, couldn't they have still used solder on the K series CPUs??? Would it add $2 to the manufacturing costs? They're already price gouging i7s at $350 (thankfully the price is dropped but they still can't compete with Ryzen lol)
This is a load of garbage.Originally Posted by Vlada011
Intel now can't compete even if drop price of i7-6900K on 500$.
He could not sell i7-6900K for 500$ even to owners of X99 platform.
And for them is better to sell own and buy 1800X and Crosshair mobo.
Intel is dead and even with half of their prices only is not aware of that.
Our duty as enthusiasts is to help AMD to sell their processors because last few years we bought proceesors just because nice motherboards.
Now Apex, Formula, Code, Extreme, Strix go in shadow of AMD and they will not be any more looked as high end RIGs because Kaby Lake is slower even than Ryzen 5.
We must underline how much is better AMD than Intel best we can and explain to people that Ryzen 5 is not faster than i7-6800K only, Intel asked 250$ more for same CPU with 12 PCI-E lanes and 200MHz more. 200MHz more base clock is not enough to one processor is better, special if Ryzen 5 with 65W power consumption is faster than Intel i7 with 140W power consumption.
This is very hard to resist to stay with Intel and I only wait some chance or good offer to recognize in my country to replace platform.
I will keep some money on side just if show some good option, but only for 1800X, than I will easy to sell RVE and i7-5820K to cover memory and ROG motherboard with AM4 socket.
OK I will wait Skylake Xtreme, but I don't expect miracle and don;t expect to Intel 6 core beat 1800X.
1) Not really, can still get a 1700X for $400 ($100 less) with AM4 platform that has an upgrade path, 2011 is dead.
Problem is that Intel's thermal paste is abysmal and usually isn't properly appliedOriginally Posted by Lays
http://overclocking.guide/the-truth-about-cpu-soldering/
TLDR, the die on new K series and process size are too small, thus the heat from soldering can't be dissipated quick enough and can damage die / damage things over-time from thermal shock.
If you are building a new system, Ryzen is the way to go. But if you already own a z170 or z270 board, it may be worthwhile to wait for an AM4 board with more pcie lanes. X8 does not limit a Titan XP, but who knows about Volta and Vega?Originally Posted by Vlada011
Intel now can't compete even if drop price of i7-6900K on 500$.
He could not sell i7-6900K for 500$ even to owners of X99 platform.
And for them is better to sell own and buy 1800X and Crosshair mobo.
Intel is dead and even with half of their prices only is not aware of that.
Our duty as enthusiasts is to help AMD to sell their processors because last few years we bought proceesors just because nice motherboards.
Now Apex, Formula, Code, Extreme, Strix go in shadow of AMD and they will not be any more looked as high end RIGs because Kaby Lake is slower even than Ryzen 5.
We must underline how much is better AMD than Intel best we can and explain to people that Ryzen 5 is not faster than i7-6800K only, Intel asked 250$ more for same CPU with 12 PCI-E lanes and 200MHz more. 200MHz more base clock is not enough to one processor is better, special if Ryzen 5 with 65W power consumption is faster than Intel i7 with 140W power consumption.
This is very hard to resist to stay with Intel and I only wait some chance or good offer to recognize in my country to replace platform.
I will keep some money on side just if show some good option, but only for 1800X, than I will easy to sell RVE and i7-5820K to cover memory and ROG motherboard with AM4 socket.
OK I will wait Skylake Xtreme, but I don't expect miracle and don;t expect to Intel 6 core beat 1800X.
1. 6900k isn't the best 8 core anymore, and 2011 platform soon will be replaced so I doubt that people want to buy it even at 500$
If they already have a z170/z270, they can upgrade to the 8700K (last 1151 cpu for them) and maybe DDR4-4000-4133-4266 if board is capable. The latter can add 12-15% in games and 22-28% in encoding
Bending pins is easily fixed if they are on the CPU. Just use a razor, creditcard, or other thin and rigid device to bend them back.Originally Posted by Gunderman456
The guy says he will use the plastic cover to hold the CPU so as not to bend the pins and does so with the razor blades, but then he proceeds to hold the pins bare hand when using the thicker blades. I can't imagine how he escaped with no bent pins.
Edit;
He bent the pins.![]()
Easy fix for some and a bad day in an attempt to fix for others.
Compared to LGA damage, its a super easy fix.
Yeah, I heard about that. My ram is rated at 3733 17-19-19. I am running at 3400 15-15-15. I wonder if slowing down timings and increasing frequency would help; or if gaming performance is a combined function of speed and timing.
I sincerely doubt we will get another CPU on the same socket. That's not what Intel does.
Except, and please correct me I'm wrong here, I don't have the patience to look up the history of every socket, but it seems to me like every socket change so far is also accompanied by some extra goodies added to the platform. Such as USB 2.0/3.0/C, PCIe 2.0/3.0, M.2, extra PCIe lanes (+4 for Z270. Granted that's a chipset change, not socket), DDR/DDR2/DDR3/DDR4, Optane, IDE/SATA I-III, and whatever else I'm forgetting. With socket changes it seems like there's always something that gets added along with it. What exactly would Intel have to add at this point? PCIe 4.0 I guess, but have the specs for that even been finalized?