Regular run, all other apps opened

 

PBO testun

 

I did not realize just how incredible this score is. According to the novabench online database, this result would put you in 3rd place overall! Out of every system they've tested! Not too shabby....

Top four results from the database:

 

Average KS, Strix D4, AIO. Is that a 7 in front of the 645 upstairs?!!!

 

GPU wasn't being fully utilized at all here. Also struggling to understand how a 3.6ghz Ivy bridge 12c/24t is scoring higher then a 4.6ghz 10c/20t 10th gen.

 

GPU wasn't being fully utilized at all here. Also struggling to understand how a 3.6ghz Ivy bridge 12c/24t is scoring higher then a 4.6ghz 10c/20t 10th gen.

It is a little puzzling. Granted, I do have 16 cores total, and 32 threads but still way behind in technology. Can you run a quick CPUz benchmark and then I will do the same on my Ivy Bridge? That will let us know a little bit more about how these two processors compare.

 

Just a quick run.

 

Leaderboard is up! Let me know if you guys want me to add / modify the data sets here....by no means is this set in stone.

Teams are color coded. AMD obviously red and Intel is blue.

 

I should ask you to change my @ 5.7 to @ 4.9 per novabench shot. I snipped that right afterwards along with ram...at idle lol. My OC is 5.2/4.0 and reflects in CB MT & CPU-Z...5.7x3 and 5.4x5 in CB ST . I tracked core speeds a few times while running this on hwinfo and they were hopping all over. Not really sure where 4.9- comes from.

 

Novabench - stahlhart06's Benchmark Result

 

View attachment 2574484

Novabench - stahlhart06's Benchmark Result

Thank you @stahlhart and @domdtxdissar
For posting the link to your online benchmark result on the novabench site. Going forward, everyone please include this if at all possible because it will show us more statistics than just the scoring/results window. I will update the original post accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Downloaded the Linux version, needs a license to run, runs from cmd line (no gui) and doesn't accept submissions. Those guys must really hate Linux

Okay, W10. Single 2696v3.

Novabench - Benchmark Result

Intel - Xeon E5 2696 v3 18C/36T, xioaxi, 3683, 2427, 294, 790, 172, Turbo all core hack

 

I might have to bring my Z840 system out of retirement for this one. I have two of the same processors in it. See how it compares to your single CPU result.
I had some liquid metal issues with the motherboard so I am forced to run it without hyperthreading but still, it should do ok.

 

 

This bench is a waste of time.
Plenty of benches on bot to run.

 

...quick run with daily settings; 7042

 

I see the benchmark snobs are on full display...

Anyway, thanks for the interest so far will update the leaderboard shortly.

 

@J7SC

I meant the naysayers not you, just fyi.

 

Updated 10/5

 

I'll try to bench later today but why not use a google sheet and just drop a link in the OP. Share it with viewing rights only. That way you don't have to keep adding screenshots.

 

I like to see progress real time, but yeah I will update the original post with the current leaderboard as well.
Normally, the reason I do this is because it offers a placeholder, so I know what submissions need to be added to keep everything current.

 

HP Z840 w/ hyperthreading disabled (36C/36T)

Not impressed with these results. All core turbo is only going to 2.8GHz

Novabench - Benchmark Result

 

HP Z840 w/ hyperthreading disabled (36C/36T)

Not impressed with these results. All core turbo is only going to 2.8GHz

That's what Intel gave us. Could have been much more but sadly not in their interest to do so.

 

One update to mine, you've got the cpu listed at 4.7 (which I see cpuz shows) but during any benchmarks it locks to 4.6ghz all core. I've got the p/l limit unlocked on the non k chip so in windows it's usually around 4.7-5.2 depending on the load. No biggie, but just wanted to have it update so people have a point of reference.

Thanks for taking the time to do this, any new benchs are welcome in my book. Funny that people come here to say it's' a waste of time when in reality they are wasting their own time complaining.

 

Office rig. 9900K @5.0GHz. Motherboard sucks so the RAM is worse than XMP. RTX 3070

 

I'm getting the idea that this benchmark is pretty consistent (in terms of CPU scoring, at least). Case in point both @Avacado and @Cryptedvick have 9900Ks that clock at 5.0GHz. And both have identical CPU scores at 1804 pts. But who knows, it could have been a fluke.

 

Wow AMD is currently dominating the leaderboard! We need to bring out the heavy artillery, my good Intel people!

 

Wow AMD is currently dominating the leaderboard! We need to bring out the heavy artillery, my good Intel people!

 

Score: 4621
5800X3D (-25 CO)
3060 Ti (Undervolted, peak freq @ 1920 Core Clocks; 16 Gbps memory)
32gb 3600 CL17 RAM (XMP, Gear Down Disabled)

https://img.novabench.com/score-image@2x/2618543.png

Novabench - Benchmark Result

4621 Novabench score with AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D CPU and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GPU

novabench.com

Bringing down the AMD average...

 

Bringing down the AMD average...

But in RAM performance you are in 2nd place... less than ten points more will put you in the lead!

 

Not the most descriptive write up in the world, but least we can get a general idea of how Novabench measures your systems performance. Full documentation can be found here: Novabench - Documentation - Test Information

 

Another bench some might not like is Octanebench which is a render benchmark on GPU(s). Sadly it's nvidia/cuda only as to date but interesting that many cards can be used together at the same time and not required to be the same model although IIRC needs GTX 700 series or higher.

 

Update