The new Radeon RX 6900 XT Liquid Cooled graphics card has AMD overclocking the TBP to 330W, and the 16GB of GDDR6 memory to 18Gbps. These two tweaks provide enough performance that AMD says the new Radeon RX 6900 XT Liquid Cooled can better battle NVIDIA's flagship GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and GeForce RTX 3090 graphics cards.
The GPU itself has a game clock of up to 2250MHz, boost clock of 2435MHz -- 235MHz and 185MHz overclocked over the air-cooled version of the Radeon RX 6900 XT, respectively.
The new Radeon RX 6900 XT Liquid Cooled graphics card has AMD overclocking the TBP to 330W, and the 16GB of GDDR6 memory to 18Gbps. These two tweaks provide enough performance that AMD says the new Radeon RX 6900 XT Liquid Cooled can better battle NVIDIA's flagship GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and GeForce RTX 3090 graphics cards.
The GPU itself has a game clock of up to 2250MHz, boost clock of 2435MHz -- 235MHz and 185MHz overclocked over the air-cooled version of the Radeon RX 6900 XT, respectively.
You’re probably right about tdp.Those seem like pretty low clocks for a liquid cooled card knowing OCers get them up 2800+ on air. I guess it must be mainly to keep the power draw where they want it so no one complains about it being a Bulldozer
Ampere is a compute architecture, it's no surprise the power it draws. AMD stripped Navi of a ton of functionality when compared to GCN to bring the TDP down. Even their "Pro" Navi cards are practicality useless except for CAD even then I'm sure Nvidia's OptiX renderer crushes it. Then we look at the hilarious pricing of the W6800 when compared to the Radeon Pro VII.You’re probably right about tdp.
Honestly I’m more surprised nobody is talking about the 3080/ti/90 tdp. My 3080 ti pulls 400w at stock, yes that’s just the card. Granted it’s the evga ftw3, but it’s still ridiculous and hard to cool in anything not amazing at air cooling.
This gen in general is really stupid about tdp, but at least the navi cards have better raster efficiency. I really wish AMD could get their software stack in the right place.
AMD's 'boost' and 'game' clocks make no sense at all.Those seem like pretty low clocks for a liquid cooled card knowing OCers get them up 2800+ on air. I guess it must be mainly to keep the power draw where they want it so no one complains about it being a Bulldozer
My 6900XT barely pulls 300W while gaming. (Watercooled Alphacool Block). Good compromise compared to the Dutch Ovens of the 3080 Ti and 3090...You’re probably right about tdp.
Honestly I’m more surprised nobody is talking about the 3080/ti/90 tdp. My 3080 ti pulls 400w at stock, yes that’s just the card. Granted it’s the evga ftw3, but it’s still ridiculous and hard to cool in anything not amazing at air cooling.
This gen in general is really stupid about tdp, but at least the navi cards have better raster efficiency. I really wish AMD could get their software stack in the right place.
sounds more like a slowly dying 3090 to me.. 🤣 and its looked like its slow..struggling for a take off..😖Liquid cooled RTX 3090 on K|NGP|N Bios
It's because it isn't a new thing, my 2080ti runs 375 watts, also a ftw3.You’re probably right about tdp.
Honestly I’m more surprised nobody is talking about the 3080/ti/90 tdp. My 3080 ti pulls 400w at stock, yes that’s just the card. Granted it’s the evga ftw3, but it’s still ridiculous and hard to cool in anything not amazing at air cooling.
This gen in general is really stupid about tdp, but at least the navi cards have better raster efficiency. I really wish AMD could get their software stack in the right place.
Free Britney...this one was officially 'released' a few months back...I much prefer the AIO 360 for a card like that...
View attachment 2514350
The benefit of the RX Vega 64 XTX was the binning, same with the RX 5700 XT black limited edition card. This is probably in the same boat....this one was officially 'released' a few months back...I much prefer the AIO 360 for a card like that...