The new Radeon RX 6900 XT Liquid Cooled graphics card has AMD overclocking the TBP to 330W, and the 16GB of GDDR6 memory to 18Gbps. These two tweaks provide enough performance that AMD says the new Radeon RX 6900 XT Liquid Cooled can better battle NVIDIA's flagship GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and GeForce RTX 3090 graphics cards.
The GPU itself has a game clock of up to 2250MHz, boost clock of 2435MHz -- 235MHz and 185MHz overclocked over the air-cooled version of the Radeon RX 6900 XT, respectively.
I found a bug with my Vega 64 when flashing bios, it would lock the highest p-state after the first reboot. I was able to benchmark at 1827Mhz, while 1800Mhz was 100% stable. It just frustrates me their cards always leave a bit of performance on the table. As soon as I restart I was back at only 1700Mhz.Ah i see what you mean. i think Nvidia does not report target clock but actual clk. That is just the PLL trying to lock on. It will never hit the target clock.
...yeah, I picked up the cheapest (albeit 3-x Pin) 6900 XT I could find, and right out of the box, it benched several 4K at between 2700 MHz and 2800 Mhz on air...that said, there are some benches that like higher clocks, while others seem to prefer a much larger power target (and undervolting). Once I customized things with the MorePowerTool (MPT), I realized how much more the card still has in the tank, but then temps stopped me, for now - until I get around to mount that new Byksi block waiting patiently on my desk. The 3090 card (part of the same productivity+entertainment build) behaved very much like it when comparing 'stock air' to full 'water block.'..the lower the temps, the better, what with boost algorithms that have temps as one of the inputsIts similar to Nvidia. You are power limited first, then voltage then temperature.
I do prefer AMD's handling of thermal throttling better than Nvidia's which starts at 40c. While AMD cards won't begin to throttle until 105c(might have changed with RDNA) on the junction temperature. When both temperature/power limitations are out of the question I don't like AMD's boost algorithm. Their "max clock" p-state leaves performance on the table....yeah, I picked up the cheapest (albeit 3-x Pin) 6900 XT I could find, and right out of the box, it benched several 4K at between 2700 MHz and 2800 Mhz on air...that said, there are some benches that like higher clocks, while others seem to prefer a much larger power target (and undervolting). Once I customized things with the MorePowerTool (MPT), I realized how much more the card still has in the tank, but then temps stopped me, for now - until I get around to mount that new Byksi block waiting patiently on my desk. The 3090 card (part of the same productivity+entertainment build) behaved very much like it when comparing 'stock air' to full 'water block.'..the lower the temps, the better, what with boost algorithms that have temps as one of the inputs
They are not leaving any performance in the table. You just have to understand how their frequency generation works. Too much info to talk about in a forum post.I do prefer AMD's handling of thermal throttling better than Nvidia's which starts at 40c. While AMD cards won't begin to throttle until 105c(might have changed with RDNA) on the junction temperature. When both temperature/power limitations are out of the question I don't like AMD's boost algorithm. Their "max clock" p-state leaves performance on the table.
It's definitely leaving performance on the table. My Vega 64 benchmarks prove it's leaving performance on the table.They are not leaving any performance in the table. You just have to understand how their frequency generation works. Too much info to talk about in a forum post.
Vega 64 is difference from Radeon 7 and again different from 5700XT/6800XTIt's definitely leaving performance on the table. My Vega 64 benchmarks prove it's leaving performance on the table.
The Vega 64 and Radeon VII behaved the same. RDNA1 algorithm looked different but it was higher than the 50Mhz difference on Vega 64/Radeon VII.Vega 64 is difference from Radeon 7 and again different from 5700XT/6800XT
The different clocks in navi 2 on a fixed max p state cap just reflects the different workloads and their power consumption
navi2 just boosts at the max that speciific workload allow them to stay in the usual power limit/temp/voltage matrix
fixed frequency gpus times are long gone (ironically it started with nvidia)
I read a blurb in Tom's Hardware the other day that the only place you can get the thing is in India, and that AMD is going to hand pick who ever they want to have it. I believe it's got an outlandish price also. Personally, I'll stick with Nvidia.
Which card doesn't have an insanely outlandish price?I read a blurb in Tom's Hardware the other day that the only place you can get the thing is in India, and that AMD is going to hand pick who ever they want to have it. I believe it's got an outlandish price also. Personally, I'll stick with Nvidia.
Only cards that are not actually for sale, everything that is for sale has an insane price. At least as far as I can tell.Which card doesn't have an insanely outlandish price?
Exactly, 3090's for 3000+ (sometimes 3500), 6700's for 1000+. Total madness.Only cards that are not actually for sale, everything that is for sale has an insane price. At least as far as I can tell.
I wonder what the excuse is for the pricing in China. The US has the tariffs that are bloating the MSRPs super high.. but in China..?Here in China prices are beyond madness. I can't believe that you were able to buy these cards at MSRP, I'm damned jealous.