2700X stock cooler -PBO.
ASUS Prime X470 Pro
2*4 GB @2993Mhz OC.

 

9900K HT 4.7GHz, RAM 2x8GB DDR4 3733MHz.

 

What the... that score is lower than the 3700X in my work computer (@ 4.2Ghz) with 3200mhz ram and a cheap board (prime x570-p) by a couple hundred points..

 

Windows Store? Ewwwwwwwwwww. Give me zip!

9900K @ 5.0, DDR4-4133 17-18-18-35 2T = 5336

Priority is set to below normal by default which is kind of weird.

 

5820k 4.3ghz 16gb DDR4-2666 = 2663CB

 

5820K @ 4.2GHz scoring 2951: https://i.imgur.com/2wnRPR9.jpg

Cache has a fair impact on score.

Seems so.

With Core2Quad the first core runs the scheduler and splits up tasks to the other cores so it always runs hotter than all other cores by design. Later starting with the first i7's on LGA1366 the scheduler was re-designed and we didn't have that issue anymore.

The scheduler isn't hardware and scheduler overhead is minimal. Even if overhead were higher, it would not be as demanding as most actual work and would actually lower effective utilization of that core during most benchmarks. OSes do tend to schedule threads to the first core first, but this doesn't explain any full load temp differential and I've definitely seen Core 2 Quads whose hottest core was not core 0.

More likely the temperature differential was simply natural variance of the part, either in silicon quality, solder quality, IHS surface (upper or lower), heatsink mount/location of the cooler's heatpipes relative to the cores, or proximity of one side of the chip to a board heat source (some thermal coupling between the board and CPU does exist, so a hot VRM, for example can cause cores on that side to load a few C warmer). Regardless, the temp differential was fairly small and nothing to be overly concerned about.

 

Hi,
lol yeah MS store dream on :thumbsdow

 

8700K @5.0/4.4, 2x8GB ddr4-4400 c19-20-20-39-2T = 4057-525

 

If you don't want to download from the MS Store you can download the standalone here.

*edit*

Here's an alternative download lnk on WorkUpload (thanks for the heads up @AlphaC!) if you don't like ZippyShare/it goes down.

 

If you don't want to download from the MS Store you can download the standalone here.

Hi,
Thanks saw it on the other news thread
It's just cinebench the extreme tweaked one is a ton better which we've already all done by now

 

Wow! Impressive score! Makes me want a 9900k @The Pook

 

Wait ~6 months for the 7nm Ryzen CPUs to come out and I'm sure no one will want a 9900K :laughings

 

Just made small test and I run R20 scene on R15, on R20 it takes 79 seconds to finish, on R15 it takes 187seconds!
So it's like Double the work of Extreme Mode lol.

 

You just hurt Intel's feelings lol.

 

9980XE @4.6GHz

 

Nice MTS, my score look weak in comparison...

 

i cant post a screen cap but i got 4045 with the ryzen 7 2700x.

 

4930k @4.5ghz, 16gb's of DDR3 1600mhz

 

Where does it install? I did the download, and it runs, but I don't see it.

If I have to DL it every time, that's not gonna work.

I have to open a CPU-Z Bench tab to get the processor speed up.

 

You might want to try the direct download That was posted earlier by @The Pook

 

Not bad for a mildly clocked 7900x with some slaw 2400mhz ram.

 

I got it pinned to taskbar now.

A little 4.7 action - couldn't re-boot to upclock until I found the dang program. In before the 2990X guys find us!

 

...2990X guys ? Check the spoiler underneath 'CB 20' here

Spoiler

https://www.overclock.net/forum/10-amd-cpus/1705286-ryzen-threadripper-2990wx-2970wx-2950x-2920x-owners-club-70.html#post27880650

 

Specs are in my sig

 

1412 CB 2500K@5GHz

 

TPU and Guru3d added download link:
https://www.techpowerup.com/download/maxon-cinebench/
https://www.guru3d.com/files-details/download-maxon-cinebench.html

OP- can you add the link in first post?

 

Yes i will add the links thanks for bringing them to my attention.

 

Ryzen 7 2700X 4.3GHz DDR4 3466 C14

 

i5 2310 (3Ghz MT, 3.1GHz ST / DDR3 1333) = 881 ( 234 single)
Core 2 Duo e7300 @ 2.8Ghz / DDR2 840 = 333 (170 single)

 

Specs in signature below not bad for slow memory and a Z370 board

 

@ 4.7

 

I can just picture MrTooShort tuning up to come clean our plows ;-)

 

2700x at 4250 and ram at 3200 not my normal overclock...quite low actually. CB 20 4350 Gonna play around today and see what I can do.

 

both 2600k scores are at 4.5 Ghz
shrug